tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31762465.post4515891335805210265..comments2023-09-28T06:26:07.114-04:00Comments on Hugh McBryde (<i>the Modern Pharisee</i>): Stats AgainHugh McBrydehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16926516260588481185noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31762465.post-41724301956712149502009-08-26T09:51:15.994-04:002009-08-26T09:51:15.994-04:00So, you seem to conclude that by believing childre...So, you seem to conclude that by believing children should be obedient to parents, that I am a hater of children?Hugh McBrydehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16926516260588481185noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31762465.post-30126229452393640862009-08-26T08:44:20.046-04:002009-08-26T08:44:20.046-04:00You said :
"I understand that defining gend...You said : <br /><br />"I understand that defining gender roles so sharply seems counter to the idea of equality, but playing one role here, for about 70 or 80 years, does not take away from the equality as heirs that all believers will later have."<br /><br />Thanks for your promise of equality in the afterlife. Most of us want equal rights, and want them NOW, not in some future fairy land.<br /><br />Your attempt to portray polygyny as something favorable for women does not ring true, coming from an admitted sexist such as yourself.<br />Your sexism is simply a manifestation of your misogyny. <br /><br />You are a misogynist, and as such, you do not deserve one thin dime for your pro - polygyny lobbying activities.catwhispererhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01829793774288384760noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31762465.post-61505650278883510042009-08-26T06:11:16.985-04:002009-08-26T06:11:16.985-04:00It is not hatred of women, to obey God and realize...It is not hatred of women, to obey God and realize they have a certain place. Women were taken from man, though as the Apostle Paul said, since then, all come from women.<br /><br />They are my sisters here on earth, my equals (if I am worthy) in the hereafter. This life is short and women have a certain role to play, as do men.<br /><br />That role is not leadership. To submit to women as leaders outside their role as parents is a disgrace to men who have abdicated their own role in doing so. <br /><br />I'm sorry if Biblical Christianity seems hateful to you. I understand that defining gender roles so sharply seems counter to the idea of equality, but playing one role here, for about 70 or 80 years, does not take away from the equality as heirs that all believers will later have.Hugh McBrydehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16926516260588481185noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31762465.post-65395486241435543032009-08-26T00:30:17.684-04:002009-08-26T00:30:17.684-04:00Failure to support equal rights for women is misog...Failure to support equal rights for women is misogyny, pure and simple. <br /><br />You seem to have respected Sarah Palin in many respects - except, of course, for the fact that she is a woman. To quote you :<br /><br />"I have been a fan of a "Palinesque" type candidate except not a fan of Palin being that candidate from the get go.<br /><br />To accept a woman as a leader for someone of such strict Biblical leanings as myself, is a defeat in and of itself. <br />For that reason I am sure some of you will shout to me that I am a sexist. So be it.<br /><br />Only because she is a woman do I regard her as a poor choice, in all other ways I greatly respect her as a political figure and candidate ...."catwhispererhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01829793774288384760noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31762465.post-46972599267600819302009-08-25T21:46:30.509-04:002009-08-25T21:46:30.509-04:00You still don't explain what that constitutes ...You still don't explain what that constitutes hating women. That simply states things are not egalitarean.<br /><br />That doesn't mean hatred.Hugh McBrydehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16926516260588481185noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31762465.post-19600967572414044012009-08-25T21:28:35.689-04:002009-08-25T21:28:35.689-04:00Because you assert that women of the Christian fai...Because you assert that women of the Christian faith can only have one husband, but men are entitled to as many as wives as they like. <br />This is hardly egalitarian, you simply dress up your misogyny in the guise of religion.catwhispererhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01829793774288384760noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31762465.post-12699326180254519162009-08-25T21:11:03.170-04:002009-08-25T21:11:03.170-04:00Why is it mysogynistic to have more than one wife?...Why is it mysogynistic to have more than one wife?Hugh McBrydehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16926516260588481185noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31762465.post-41397850607489845152009-08-25T21:06:13.925-04:002009-08-25T21:06:13.925-04:00You said :
"Ultimately the biggest losers in ...You said :<br />"Ultimately the biggest losers in polygyny are not the women, ....the biggest losers are men. Lousy men. The "vibe" I have picked up from these men is the deeply misogynistic feeling that they have a "right" to a woman."<br /><br />Are they indeed "lousy", or are they simply of a lower socioeconomic status than those rich men who are able to attract (and afford) multiple wives?<br /><br />As a second point, who would qualify as a "bigger" misogynist -<br />the "loser" with no wife in this situation, or someone, such as yourself, who asserts that "God" permits men to have multiple wives, while women can have only one husband?catwhispererhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01829793774288384760noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31762465.post-79258986473120991192009-08-23T13:05:34.521-04:002009-08-23T13:05:34.521-04:00Cat,
I do not at all assume that they agree with ...Cat,<br /><br />I do not at all assume that they agree with me, but a lot of them do.<br /><br />Being aware of my activities means that my topic is fascinating. A train wreck can be fascinating.Hugh McBrydehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16926516260588481185noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31762465.post-90651676992649919182009-08-23T11:34:29.705-04:002009-08-23T11:34:29.705-04:00You are assuming that your site has a lot of traff...You are assuming that your site has a lot of traffic because people agree with you. I would not assume that. I would offer that many of your readership don't agree with you, but want to be aware of your activities.catwhispererhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01829793774288384760noreply@blogger.com