tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31762465.post4692744534054352732..comments2023-09-28T06:26:07.114-04:00Comments on Hugh McBryde (<i>the Modern Pharisee</i>): UPDATED (new information): Redacting Sarah and other Observations on the Jeffs motion.Hugh McBrydehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16926516260588481185noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31762465.post-58441554717280935222009-01-19T18:50:00.000-05:002009-01-19T18:50:00.000-05:00Regarding these warrants you just know that ultima...Regarding these warrants you just know that ultimately Texas is going to claim it's irrelevant whether or not LE believed Dale Barlow was never at the ranch because they initially entered on the "order for investigation of Child Abuse" on behalf of CPS(?) as Toes <A HREF="http://soretoesandableedingheart.blogspot.com/2009/01/its-about-time.html" REL="nofollow">surmises concerning this CYA move.</A><BR/><BR/>It would be good to see Jeffs defense explicitely addressing this "Order for Investigation" and doing depositions to determine how closely information was shared between LE and CPS, under what strength the initial entry was made, etc. E.g. was the first warrent never executed? If so, why?S931Coderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17609807805714986516noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31762465.post-76855105961743932642009-01-17T11:10:00.000-05:002009-01-17T11:10:00.000-05:00Thanks Toes. I'm still struggling with converting...Thanks Toes. I'm still struggling with converting PDF's which I got done once, but can't remember how I did it.<BR/><BR/>I typed the whole thing secretary style. I should have had an Underwood Clickedy Clack sound effect for doing it last night. I'm sure there are errors. Feel free to correct me and copy an use the doc and compare it to the original PDF. We can all use it.Hugh McBrydehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16926516260588481185noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31762465.post-2746748985857892972009-01-17T10:44:00.000-05:002009-01-17T10:44:00.000-05:00Would love to see a copy of that "Exhibit 3". FWI...Would love to see a copy of that "Exhibit 3". <BR/><BR/>FWIW, I read that paragraph the same way you do.Toeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11749070231826492410noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31762465.post-71352209186874325562009-01-17T10:34:00.000-05:002009-01-17T10:34:00.000-05:00a typo -- in the Texas 2-step paragraph, your four...a typo -- in the Texas 2-step paragraph, your fourth line reads:<BR/><BR/>"evidenced by the <B>case</B> with which it was determined", <BR/><BR/>and should be <BR/><BR/>"evidenced by the <B> ease</B> with which it was determined"<BR/><BR/>I've largely overcome my obsession with making corrections, and I'd leave it alone, but it is the gist of the claim. The ease of determining whether the call was real.Toeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11749070231826492410noreply@blogger.com