tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31762465.post538648177042241586..comments2023-09-28T06:26:07.114-04:00Comments on Hugh McBryde (<i>the Modern Pharisee</i>): FLDS Topic Centered Alexa RankingsHugh McBrydehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16926516260588481185noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31762465.post-84269947720703457402008-07-23T12:35:00.000-04:002008-07-23T12:35:00.000-04:00So then I go into the top 100 in the world...#35 y...So then I go into the top 100 in the world...<BR/><BR/>#35 youporn<BR/>#49 redtube<BR/><BR/>and the people of the US and the world call the FLDS perverts?!bleuhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06591663244349874668noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31762465.post-29351463129689958522008-07-23T12:25:00.000-04:002008-07-23T12:25:00.000-04:00Today (7-23-08), in the 100 most popular sites in ...Today (7-23-08), in the 100 most popular sites in the US...<BR/><BR/>#29 youporn<BR/>#34 redtube<BR/>#38 pornhub<BR/>#58 adultaworld<BR/>#65 livejasmin<BR/>#85 xtube<BR/>#90 xvideos<BR/><BR/>Not one religious site listed in the top 100.bleuhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06591663244349874668noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31762465.post-66872352688494667692008-07-23T01:32:00.000-04:002008-07-23T01:32:00.000-04:00hugh, I asked that question and about two minutes ...hugh, I asked that question and about two minutes later I had a "duh" moment.Pliggyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13093939505833710898noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31762465.post-49758800137097134542008-07-22T21:39:00.000-04:002008-07-22T21:39:00.000-04:00I included everyone bigger than "Texas Polygamy" b...I included everyone bigger than "Texas Polygamy" blogspot that was devoting much of their blogging to the FLDS controversy.Hugh McBrydehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16926516260588481185noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31762465.post-59573993019103820232008-07-22T18:16:00.000-04:002008-07-22T18:16:00.000-04:00Where do FLDS 101 and other anti sites figure?Where do FLDS 101 and other anti sites figure?Amandahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01190318958415416809noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31762465.post-7501114677007896362008-07-22T18:07:00.000-04:002008-07-22T18:07:00.000-04:00ah. thanks, slow mind today. the light bulb is ag...ah. thanks, slow mind today. the light bulb is aglow. I understand now.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31762465.post-80239726954737783022008-07-22T12:26:00.000-04:002008-07-22T12:26:00.000-04:00The numbers don't represent "Hits" but relative po...The numbers don't represent "Hits" but relative position on the World Wide Web in the United States. One would imagine that sites like "Google" would be number one.Hugh McBrydehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16926516260588481185noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31762465.post-5413535694102728912008-07-22T11:44:00.000-04:002008-07-22T11:44:00.000-04:00Amazing. All those thousands of "hits", and so fe...Amazing. All those thousands of "hits", and so few signers of the petition for a balanced Senate hearing.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31762465.post-82585552857081300482008-07-21T18:28:00.000-04:002008-07-21T18:28:00.000-04:00It's numerical rank. In College Football Rankings...It's numerical rank. In College Football Rankings, you want to be "Number One," same deal here.Hugh McBrydehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16926516260588481185noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31762465.post-52448652251213586622008-07-21T17:20:00.000-04:002008-07-21T17:20:00.000-04:00I am somewhat confused, how is the low numbers are...I am somewhat confused, how is the low numbers are higher? Your list, is top to bottom or bottom to top?Pliggyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13093939505833710898noreply@blogger.com