tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31762465.post5491844646970196318..comments2023-09-28T06:26:07.114-04:00Comments on Hugh McBryde (<i>the Modern Pharisee</i>): Daphne Bramham's analysis provides no simple answer?Hugh McBrydehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16926516260588481185noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31762465.post-20820757142484886102009-01-12T11:33:00.000-05:002009-01-12T11:33:00.000-05:00Could be, one could hardly blame Daphne for the He...Could be, one could hardly blame Daphne for the Headline, or, maybe we could. It appeared in the another paper with exactly the same Headline.Hugh McBrydehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16926516260588481185noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31762465.post-69842640881092894042009-01-12T10:44:00.000-05:002009-01-12T10:44:00.000-05:00I'm assuming this airhead was speaking about the f...I'm assuming this airhead was speaking about the fact that the women and children are already happy and simply don't complain against their husbands and fathers to authorities, and so haven't been able to get a witness, which is a prerequisite in Canada before bringing charges (unlike Texas and Utah). Of course the airhead wrote the title without checking the Text. She's probably got article titles confused with one of the other slander pieces.S931Coderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17609807805714986516noreply@blogger.com