tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31762465.post7751195514674026981..comments2023-09-28T06:26:07.114-04:00Comments on Hugh McBryde (<i>the Modern Pharisee</i>): The Tribune Finally Owns UpHugh McBrydehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16926516260588481185noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31762465.post-89656886641353985902009-11-13T10:05:26.650-05:002009-11-13T10:05:26.650-05:00The Trib is admitting here that it was in the tank...The Trib is admitting here that it was in the tank for conviction, and took the position that the 4th Amendment was merely procedural.<br /><br />Well DUH. Justice is procedural, and that procedural problem was important enough to stick the PROCEDURE, in the CONSTITUTION.Hugh McBrydehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16926516260588481185noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31762465.post-22368857054698935522009-11-13T09:47:33.365-05:002009-11-13T09:47:33.365-05:00"...convict [Raymond] of Bigamy this cloud ma...<i>"...convict [Raymond] of Bigamy this cloud may eventually have a big silver lining."</i><br /><br />I do not recall the age of the wife involved in the bigamy charge Raymond is yet to face. Big factor in past cases.kbphttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11814695387546108048noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31762465.post-18581711436837797412009-11-12T18:51:07.801-05:002009-11-12T18:51:07.801-05:00They are pandering to political rhetoric, as actua...They are pandering to political rhetoric, as actual occurrence, it is equivocation on a mass scale.<br /><br />They only reason Janet wasn't up there pleading for leniency is that she would have been crossed by the State on polygamy to build a case against Raymond down the road. Don't be surprise if they now drop that charge.<br /><br />Of course if they convict him of Bigamy this cloud may eventually have a big silver lining.Hugh McBrydehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16926516260588481185noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31762465.post-86816968385284248012009-11-12T18:47:04.648-05:002009-11-12T18:47:04.648-05:00"In our view, there is no question that this ..."In our view, there is no question that this is a crime of sexual violence which cannot be justified or explained away by reliance on the constitutional rights of religious freedom."<br /><br />I don't know who wrote that, and won't bother finding out, but that's the very type of mindset that's making me realize more and more that time's up for this type of judicial perversion.<br /><br />"Violence"!? That's completely a product their imagination. That, along with many other aspects of the trial can never be proven. It was truly a "Guilty by Collective Imagination" trial.Xorphshirehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04622167369305858202noreply@blogger.com