Monday, January 12, 2009

Winston Blackmore, has a BLOG

Hat tip to FeVaFotos. "Share the Light," is Winston Blackmore's blog. Winston's Home Page is, "The North Star," on which is contained his statement.
At present both have a page rank of "no data." I imagine, that will change. Nothing like a good persecution to call attention to someone, and something, no one cared about.

"Since I am not going to take your questions upon advice of legal counsel, and since you all know that whether I have liked it or not I have always tried to accommodate the media, I will try to anticipate your questions in this statement.

Almost nineteen years ago we were discovered by the media. We didn’t even know that we were lost. It has taken three AG’s, many special prosecutors, and millions and millions of tax payers dollars, almost nineteen years to arrive at the conclusion that Fundamentalist Mormons want to practice the fundamentals of their faith.

Canada has a law against polygamy. It was made in or around 1892 and was made specifically against the Mormons. Canada also has a Charter of Rights and Freedoms that guarantees every person the right to live their religion, and I guess now, every person except those of us who are Fundamentalist believing and practicing Mormons.

This is not about the police. They kindly waited until my children would be all at school before they came to arrest me. They certainly did not expect that school would be delayed for two hours because a foot of heavy snow had fallen in the night and all my school children were still home. They also did not know that my three children that want to be police officers when they grow up, a 16 year old girl, a 12 year old boy, and an eleven year old boy got to witness the process. My children hated the police all day long and were still hating them when I got home. I have met dozens of police officers over the years and made many good friends among them. I was treated very kindly by the arresting officers but can honestly say to them, you have some pr work to do with some of my family members, and perhaps since Canada has chosen to disregard our basic charter rights then you should at least work in some sensitivity when it comes to dealing with our children.

This is not about Polygamy. Tens of thousands of polygamists among many different cultures are hiding in plain sight all across Canada. They are known by their neighbors, policemen, legislators and media just as we are. I am sure that they are an active valued part of the economic structure of the communities in which they live just as we are. But they are not fundamentalist Mormons! To us this is about religious persecution. Persecution has always been about politics. Whatever else is involved with it, it is still about politics. It is therefore no surprise to us that this spectacular grandstanding event has happened in the face of an up and coming provincial election. I hope this government has calculated all the risks. Time will tell.

My family reaction was negative and yesterday was a hard day for them. There was no way that we could talk. They listened to the news, collectively fielded hundreds of phone calls and waited. My little children couldn’t do their school work, and were emotional and traumatized by the uncertainty of the event. My college children couldn’t focus. I didn’t know about it all day but a number of my dear family members waited outside to see me when I was released. We had a wonderful reunion and as I stood there in Cranbrook with a dozen grown up sons and daughters, all struggling in their own way to understand this religious persecution, not to mention the inevitable question of why a government presiding over this economy, would target them as employers, students, workers, taxpayers, all the while wasting enormous amounts of their hard earned dollars waging a political religious campaign. One quipped, “wouldn’t it be nice if this government focused their political and financial energy on creating jobs”? I had this huge feeling of gratitude that these fine men and woman are what my life is really all about. My family will be just fine.

Where do we go from here? I have to make an appearance on January 21. You will all be welcome to stay home from that event. I plan on doing what I have always done. I will get up and get my children up for school. We will live each day as we have done for the last nineteen years. We will teach our children the best we can, help them get a good education, and I will try and encourage my children that want to be police officers to do so, because Canada needs good, fair, unbiased officers, from coast to coast that will honestly deal with the diverse multicultural society that it has become, without discriminating against those visible or invisible minorities, whether racial, religious or simply cultural. I want my children to respect the First Nations People of our great country, to stand in honor with them and recognize according to our Book of Mormon teachings that they were preserved by the hand of God upon this land. I want my children to grow up, get a good education, go to work and do a good job for the business that hires them, and a better job for the people that they employ. Naturally, I want them to cherish my faith, but if they do not, they are growing up knowing that their dad will always till the day he dies be there to joy in their joys, sorrow in their sorrows, and encourage them to do right along the way. I am what I am, we are what we are. We are descended from a long line of Mormon believing people. My family did not make up our faith nor did we establish the fundamental teachings of Mormonism. Jesus Christ is our Lord and Savior. He has taught us, and I have taught my children that they should pray for their enemies as well as their friends. That is what we will continue to do.

I want to thank the hundreds, if not by now thousands who have called in their support. You guys are the best."

As always, I am not remotely LDS/FLDS/Mormon. I think their faiths are deceptions. Nevertheless, we all have a place in God's grand device, and more than that, we are all in his image. Justice is justice for us, and for all. For the stranger, and for the believer. I am grateful to Winston for getting this issue before the courts of Canada.

More →

Sphere: Related Content

15 FLDS kids remain.

Reading the article shows just how hard it will be to get the label "abuser" removed
, once it's been affixed to your name.


The Deseret News
- "28 individuals have asked for an administrative review of Texas Child Protective Services' findings, the agency said. It came after letters were sent out over the past several months, identifying individuals in 91 cases as perpetrators of child abuse or neglect."


91 cases of abuse and neglect, 28 people have objected to the label, BUT:

"The 439 children were returned to their families in June, after two Texas courts ruled the state acted improperly and the children were not at immediate risk of abuse. The phone call itself is believed to be a hoax. Only 15 children remain under court jurisdiction in what was once the nation's largest child custody case. The rest have been "nonsuited" after CPS found either no evidence of abuse and neglect, or said that parents had taken appropriate steps to protect their children from abuse."


Only 15 kids are still under court jurisdiction. Maybe some of the 91 cases of abuse, and 28 people objecting are cases of "aging out" but it would seem CPS returned some children that were labeled neglecters and abusers. Do the time but not the crime? A Scarlet letter but no Dimmesdale?
More →

Sphere: Related Content

Sunday, January 11, 2009

Bountiful locals weigh in, Price is no object according to the politicians

It's a better article than would have been written by the Eldorado Success
.

The Cranbrook Daily Townsman
- (Kootenay East MLA Bill Bennett) - "I can't say enough about Wally Oppal's doggedness on this file. He's really been responsive any time I've talked to him about Bountiful. He wanted evidence, obviously, to lay a charge, but couldn't lay a charge until they had it. I think he deserves a lot of credit here."


Dogged? What has Oler or Blackmore been charged with that they couldn't have been charged with a few days after they set foot in Bountiful? The charges are proof they couldn't find anything on the FLDS contingent in Canada, so they charged them with the only thing they could charge them with.

"(Audrey) Vance said she doesn't care who gets the credit as long as Blackmore was charged with polygamy instead of sexual assault or some other charge that would leave the polygamy law unchallenged.

'We've been skirting around this issue for a long time. Polygamy is against the law of Canada. So for me, I'm glad he was charged with that. As Canadians, I think it's time we made up our minds on the polygamy issue.' "


Audrey first seems to take a rational position, that the case should be tested, but then downshifts into utter nonsense.

"A member of Altering Destiny Through Education, a Creston-based group, which has fought for years for the right of Bountiful children to attend the public school system, Vance said her main concern is the children of Bountiful.

'For those of us that have learned so much the last six years, it isn't about consenting adults. It's about taking any young female that the 'prophet' feels should be married to an old man. So to me it's about children's rights in this country. That's the way I've always felt about it.' "


"Fought for the 'right' of Bountiful children to attend the public school system?" I'm glad she tells us it's how she feels about it. Who cares how she feels about it? Has it dawned on her than no one has been charged with abuse after all that investigation? Audrey would seem to be an idealist that thinks that the day will be won when the naturally abusive condition of polygyny is finally shown to be illegal. Good luck with that Audrey, I think monogamy as marriage, the only form of marriage, is going down in Canada.

"Bennett, meanwhile, said the Province is going to great lengths in the Bountiful prosecution to separate it from any possible taint of politics by putting independent prosecutor Terrence Robertson in charge of the case."


And they punt, to an "independent prosecutor" whose job it will be to expand the charges to anything and everything. At least Canada is leading with the correct charge as polygamy is in fact illegal. In this case if child abuse is found, as defined by law, they'll have reason to conduct the search and find the evidence. I would disagree with how they define child abuse, but Canada does have the right to make it's laws.

"Bennett agreed the case could be long and expensive, but said that's not the issue. The polygamy law must be tested, he said. 'This, I believe, is in the public interest. I agree with the special prosecutor and the attorney general on that.' "


Saddle up Cranbrook, politicians don't care how much of your money they spend, refer to Texas to see how much can be spent.
More →

Sphere: Related Content

Keeping Up with Rozita's "Flexible" court dates

On the Associated Press calender, Rozita is scheduled to appear tomorrow
.

Castle Rock, Colorado - "Probation revocation hearing for Rozita Swinton, a person of interest in hoax calls that triggered Texas polygamy raids, on her conviction in an unrelated false reporting case in Colorado."


Her attorney is twisting and turning and employing every trick and skill he has to keep her probation from being revoked. If she goes back to jail, she's not quite so "sequestered." I still wonder where the money is coming from. A 33 year old single woman who didn't have the wherewithal to buy a home is now effectively unemployed for 9 months, employing a relatively pricey piece of local legal talent (effectively), and getting extensive, perhaps even more expensive, mental health treatment and evaluation.

Let me tell you something based on my extensive experience as a lay person trying to sort out the "mental health system" mess. You do not stay in mental hospitals as long as Rozita has unless you're already in jail. Rozita is free on bond. Someone is paying a lot of money to keep her out of jail, off the street and in a mental health care facility. Yet no one has written story one on this throbbing sore thumb detail. Not word one.

It does appear that the Associated Press thinks THIS appearance is significant enough to put it on their calender.
More →

Sphere: Related Content

I was once in a town so cold......

How cold was it? The thermometer at their house is "buried"
at the extreme low end. The more sophisticated thermometer at the National Wildlife Refuge "broke" at -78. If you can get past the NPR idiots making bad Sarah Palin jokes in the audio clip, you will discover that they don't really know how cold it is.

It's so cold they don't know how cold it is. It could be -81 or lower. They say it's -78 because they don't have the equipment to measure it any lower. They. Really. Don't. Know. Tok, Alaska.
More →

Sphere: Related Content

Saturday, January 10, 2009

"Can anyone presume to tell where religious instruction ends and brainwashing begins?"

Hat tip to blogger "Sandy" at Introspection of a Plural Wife (at Heart). Iain Hunter writes the column that says it all
.

The Victoria Times-Colonist - "I've seen high Anglicans genuflecting, Quakers quaking and holy rollers rolling in their places of worship, and it has occurred to me that something has happened to their brains. But when they emerge, shriven or whatever, they seem perfectly normal again.

It's the same with people of other faiths I've seen on TV, lacerating their bodies, beheading live chickens and crawling with their faces in the mud. I presume they have families to look after and jobs to go to.

What the Bountiful women have done, though, is more permanent. They've hitched themselves, like sled dogs, to one man so that he can 'raise up seed' and qualify to get to the celestial kingdom.

If they, and their man, really believe this is their religious duty, what right has any non-believer to stop them from performing it? And how can anyone presume to tell where religious instruction ends and brainwashing begins?"


Also he points out this circular logic, unseen by its users;

"A lot of people seem to assume that these young, healthy women in a polygamous relationship have been brainwashed by those with religious authority over them. They believe no self-respecting sister would subject herself to this kind of arrangement of her own free will. Ergo, this must be stopped."


All Polygamy is backward and abusive and it is self evidently so. Therefore, any woman in one, has to be brainwashed, and must be rescued and deprogrammed. But at Short Creek years ago, and in Texas today, there are no Patricia Hearsts, no victims of Stockholm syndrome that "snap out of it." The still believe, what they believed before when they were being abused at close quarters and being brainwashed after 9 months of "choice," or maybe they just believe it.

"Attorney General Wally Oppal's determination to lay criminal charges against Winston Blackmore, with 26 wives at last count, and James Oler, with two, is something that a lot of people would have applauded about 60 years ago when it was supposedly first considered by the government of the day.

The opinion of most legal experts seems to be, though, that it's too late. The Charter of Rights' guarantee of religious freedom, they say, overrides the Criminal Code's section outlawing polygamy, the section the Crown has chosen to use to prosecute the two men."

Read it all.
More →

Sphere: Related Content

Willie Rousted Again

(Photo by Leah Hogsten/ The Salt Lake Tribune)

Either he's becoming genuinely amused or a little cranky
about it. His myth precedes him I guess. He does have that Darth Willie thing goin' on with all that black.




The Salt Lake Tribune - "(Willie) Jessop and two companions were stopped at noon and allowed to enter the country at about 4:15 p.m. MDT. During the wait, Canada Border Service Agency officials searched their laptops and a camera. They earlier had searched the men's Lincoln Navigator and their personal bags, Jessop said."


This happened down in Texas as well, he was pulled over going to the courthouse. It's called a shakedown.
More →

Sphere: Related Content

Friday, January 09, 2009

Bill Medvecky hits the Radar Screen

BLIP !


From Brooke Adam's blog, "The Plural Life."


"So what did we do to pass the time? The reporters chatted. Caseworkers and ad litems (there were 13 in the courtroom by my count) chatted. And read.

Copies of an article were being passed around among the state workers, and I got a glance at the headline: 'CPS dykes want to groom [girl’s name omitted].' Yikes, I thought, not exactly material you want CPS caseworkers reading dur(i)ng a hearing on whether you are capable of caring for your daughter."


Thanks to Bill, we know for certain now that CPS in Texas reads the blogs. Thanks guys and gals. Hope you love it. I'm assuming of course they cruise mine from time to time. Sorry 'bout your Cowboys. Maybe next year.

At any rate, as I tried to explain to an alleged attorney poster at Brooke's blog, Rule one, DO NOT DIGNIFY THE MINOR OPPOSITION BY RESPONDING TO THEM (or naming them). Rule two? Refer to rule one. Next thing you know Bill will be getting tickets to Oprah to be her guest. When all you really have is a "convict them in the press" strategy, it's not a good idea to create news for the other side. Yet that is what they have done.

Since I now must assume that DFPS in Texas reads the "Pro FLDS" or "FLDS Centric" or "FLDS Friendly blogs," I'd like to provide them with a handy little tool.

Whenever you're wondering, just click.

As of today (it may change tomorrow) the number one PRO FLDS or ANTI site is:

Truth Will Prevail.

The rest in order are:

The Modern Pharisee! (Me Me Me Me Me Me!)

Free the FLDS Children (Bill)

The Common Room

Contraries

Sore Toes and a Bleeding Heart

Child Brides (Flora's site?)

Texas Polygamy

All of these are ranked by "Alexa Rankings" in the United States. The overall number at the bottom of the page, not the top. If your blog or site didn't have such a number, it didn't make the list. Comment if you think I missed one, and I'll insert it in the appropriate place right away. For a limited time. I assume that rankings will change over the next few days or weeks, Bill might outshine Google if he doesn't watch it.

I left out blogs like "Grits for Breakfast" which is a high ranking and great blog, but Scott doesn't blog consistantly on the FLDS so his fame is largely due to other pursuits. I can't break out Brooke's blog from Salt Lake Tribune statistics, but I would assume that if I could, it would outrank us all. Maybe all of us combined. Since I believe the facts are on the FLDS side, Brooke, though nominally neutral, would appear to be "Pro" FLDS most of the time.

What's notable is that they are almost all PRO or FLDS leaning blogs. 7 months ago, "Texas Polygamy," a nominally neutral (but really anti) spot was on top. Child Brides has never drawn very much traffic, and I now rate just below what must pass for the official FLDS mouthpiece, "Truth Will Prevail."

This shows you what people believe, where the news is, whose anaylsis they trust and where sympathies lie. Beyond inflaming the ill informed, the Anti FLDS side hasn't got much. As soon as the truth breaks through, and dawns on most of the nation, if it ever does, Texas is toast, and they've started giving us publicity. Hopefully, they'll try to investigate or arrest someone.
More →

Sphere: Related Content

Thursday, January 08, 2009

Does Philip Berg have standing now?

Congress has certified the results of the votes of the Electoral College and recognized that Barack Hussein Obama is to be the next President of the United States, assuming George Bush doesn't die on us
in the next two weeks.

As I observed earlier today, the Supreme Court of the United States may in fact have acted properly when they denied his standing to question the qualification of Mr. Obama to be President. What about now? A President is (customarily) sworn in by the Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court. Can a writ of mandamus now essentially be asked of that Court, demanding that they perform their constitutional duty and examine the qualifications of the man about to be our President?

Wikipedia - "From 1789 through 2005, the swearing-in has been administered by 14 Chief Justices, one Associate Justice, three federal judges, two New York state judges, and one notary public. Though anyone legally authorized to administer an oath may swear in a President, to date the only person to do so who was not a judge was John C. Coolidge, Calvin Coolidge's father, a notary whose home the then-Vice President was visiting in 1923 when he learned of the death of President Warren G. Harding."


I guess the order would be to enjoin anyone from administering the oath of office, as a notary public can do the job. Now, who can ask for that court order? Who would have standing at this point? Someone would have to. All we would be asking, is that Barack Hussein Obama present his original birth certificate or a certified copy from Hawaii, to say he is a natural born citizen of the United States.
More →

Sphere: Related Content

It's the BOOK DEALS STUPID.

Two books are written referencing Rozita Swinton before the Raid
. I'm not even sure if there was a YFZ when Vanity Publishing Whore Mary Catharine Nelson first put pen to paper on her forgettable tomes that she rushed right out and shamelessly hawked the moment Rozita's name hit the news. She's now all quiet about it, I suspect hoping to benefit from selling Rozita's story, once it's all over. Who do you think (speculation) is paying Rozita's considerable legal bills and mental health treatment bills?

Flora has made a cottage industry out of being an Anti FLDS activist. I guess you can't pole dance your way to stardom. God help her father if her allegations of about incestuous rape turn out to be true. It would really explain a lot, but women never lie about rape. Do they? Flora's book is out this week. I won't link to it. I will tell you that her DVD is "no longer availabe." Chasing the FLDS is Flora's fan dance since she can't sell peaks anymore.

Vancouver Sun Reporter Daphne Bramham has her book go to paperback this week. Accompanying Wag the Dog media event? Two Bountiful FLDS men are arrested for Polygamy. No doubt salacious charges were pursued by Canadian Law Enforcement. There weren't any. So they charged them with Polygamy to show they were "doing something."

Elissa Wall is persuaded by Flora that she is a victim, she has a book. It was published, oh my, to coincide with the YFZ raid. Her relatives advise David Doran. Flora Jessop is said to advise David Doran.

Follow the money. Elissa is trying to feed off the UEP trust, which may have nothing left in it after Bruce Wissan is done. Everyone is lining up for a book deal or a miniseries or a movie or all three. Government is being manipulated by the shameless publicity of the press. You don't get re-elected by seeming to do nothing about law breakers, so they go arrest, they go raid, they put people in jail, they interrogate, they pander. But they hate it. They'd rather polygamy be legal so they could pursue something else and not get hit up with questions about polygynists "abuse" during their elections, but they can't get elected, saying that.

I will warn the anti FLDS foes again, if you don't get results, then eventually Law Enforcement will turn on you. They don't enjoy being made fools of, they don't wish to be the football. The smiling young lady from Niger, takes off on the Tiger, but when she came back from the ride, the lady was inside, and a smile, was on the face of the Tiger.

Ask yourselves, those of you who hate the FLDS, will you survive having all your worldly goods turned out on the lawn and being sifted through? Will there be a seed of a marijuana plant, maybe a little "crank" in your houses? Will there be evidence of Tax Evasion? Are you lesbians or bisexuals? Will there be evidence of "molestation?" Violence? Abuse? There are oh so many laws that will be selectively applied by an angry Attorney General or Governor who doesn't like being used.

Several years ago I got an angry obscene call in the middle of the night from an angry man who took issue with me. He eventually persuaded the police to come visit me, who I voluntarily allowed into my home. Spooky similarity there, hmmmmmmm? These police were apologetic and embarrassed and had consented to see me just to shut up the hysterical complainer, from out of state.

Angry myself, I pursued the issue for a while and was eventually told by a Gallatin county detective that essentially, he could find a law (he actually named one) that he could use against me, if I didn't stop complaining. I was right. I received the obscene phone call but all that Donut munching moron was interested in was making the issue go away. He wasn't interested in interstate prosecution of a misdemeanor beef. Also, eerily similar to the present issue.

Eventually, when things continue to not pan out, when "wolf" has been cried enough, the Donut Muncher will be tired, of you. Perhaps he's not such a moron after all, and he will no longer be your plaything, and then, watch out.

In the meantime, if you want to know what's really going on at YFZ, and with the FLDS, follow the money, or at least, who's trying to or succeeding in making money off the event.

Also, remember something. My website is bigger than Flora's, has been for a while now. Does anybody really care what the FLDS are doing unless the "stuff" hits the fan? Why is she called about anything when her DVD's don't sell and are discontinued and her website gets no hits is she called about anything? Why is she interviewed? She's a STRIPPER for goodness sake. Call Donald Richter. Heck, call me. More people go looking for our sites than for hers when they want to know what's happening. Call Bill Medvecky. But Flora? No one cares but she keeps getting face time as the Paris Hilton of the polygamy controversy. If she stopped being on TV, no one would pay attention. They don't really pay attention now.

If you legalize polygamy, heck, I'll go away. With nothing. Fine by me.
More →

Sphere: Related Content

Congress to certify Electoral College results at 1 pm

This article at Wikipedia is instructive reading. If you read and understand, you will see how it provides for state, not Federal control of elections. It also provides for an inevitable process in which a President WILL BE ELECTED, either by some reflection of popular candidate or legislative process. The idea is that we get President chosen and challenges to that election process not deter the United States from finding a Chief Executive. The founders were geniuses
. You do NOT want a popular vote election. You want this. If you have any doubts, you have only to refer to Minnesota. A popular election of President might well result in civil war some day.

It makes it all the more interesting that SCOTUS will hear arguments tomorrow, not earlier, on the Obama Birth Certificate issue. There's really no point in doing it earlier. President of the Senate Dick Cheney could ask for the proof, from Obama, of his eligibility to be President of the United States. If he can't prove it, there's no need for SCOTUS to intervene. Congress would then have to pick a candidate from the top three vote getters (electoral college) for President. We would then have a President. Duly and legally elected, no need for court intervention.

Hence, they meet tomorrow, but if John McCain gets elected by Congress as one of the Top Three Electoral Vote "getters" as President, because Obama cannot show ID, then they have nothing to do tomorrow. I suspect no one plans to ask for ID. Maybe that's because they've seen it, perhaps that's because they don't wish to do their jobs.

This in my humble estimation explains why Philip Berg had no standing. Congress must do it's business first. He might have standing if they don't ask for Obamessiah's ID, and certify his election. Maybe SCOTUS sees this entirely as the province of the Legislature, which would be, after a fashion, a good thing, and perhaps a precedent of sorts that could be cited when there are court attempts to overturn elections.
More →

Sphere: Related Content

UPDATED: Oh Please, this is TOO OBVIOUS, Bountiful Raid another "Assist" to a Book.

It was "weird" and "tinfoil hat wearing" to suggest that the YFZ raid was in large part, a money grubbing attempt
by anti FLDS forces to line their pockets. I mean, look at all the neatly timed book deals, including Flora Jessop's book timed to come out (ahem) now, just as the Bountiful Raid kicks off, and this, noted by the Vancouver Sun.


"Daphne Bramham's book, The Secret Lives of Saints: Child Brides and Lost Boys in Canada's Polygamous Mormon Sect, was published by Random House and is shortlisted for the B.C. National Non-Fiction Book Award. It was released in paperback by Vintage Canada this week."


Ok FLDS. Get some contacts in the publishing world. Try to be "elsewhere" when a book is about to hit the paperback shelves or a new publishing effort is kicking off. I suggest you take cruises. Be in the middle of the South Pacific. Try a visit to Madagascar. Put the Gaza Strip on your sight-seeing agenda. Go some place safe, the next time an enemy decides to publish a book.

Why is this not a psychotic delusion of the pajama wearing crazy FLDS supporting Blog Universe? Because in researching the Bountiful arrests, I discovered that it is so obvious, I wasn't the first to see it. I can claim it was an original thought, but not that I was the first to notice.

UPDATE
:

The Straight (Vancouver) - "My suspicions were aroused after the B.C. Achievement Foundation selected Vancouver Sun reporter Daphne Bramham's book, The Secret Lives of Saints: Child Brides and Lost Boys in Canada's Polygamous Mormon Sect (Random House), as one of four finalists for a $40,000 prize for the best nonfiction book of the year in Canada."


He goes on to observe that the Author, is a reporter, for the Vancouver Sun.

"A report a few years ago proved there was no politics in the charge-approval process, the bureaucrat could insist. The RCMP conduct investigations, which is separate from the work that the Crown does. Anyone who doesn't know this doesn't understand how the justice system works. Blah blah blah.

And this could be the kicker: any journalist who suggests otherwise is just another a conspiracy theorist.

But there's one thing the Crown can't deny: the timing of these charges couldn't have been better for the B.C. Liberals' reelection chances or for the premier awarding a nonfiction book prize to a Vancouver Sun reporter"

Bwahahahahahahaha....

Media Wars, I can see it now, warring tribes of journalists, straight out of the Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy. I would not link to any Daphne Bramham stories at this point, for factual information, there's a huge conflict of interest.

More →

Sphere: Related Content

Firsts, again.

I am a bit shocked, a number of "firsts," continue to happen. Let me lead of by stating another thing, for the first time.

Thank you all, everyone who reads this blog.

I hadn't expected to be mentioning "firsts" so soon this year, but as measured by "Analytics" (a Google Blogger tool) The Modern Pharisee took a quantum leap in daily hits this week, I now hover around three hundred daily "hits." They're real readers too, as "Alexa" measures my page use rate now at nearly 2 per visit. Since I do a lousy job of boosting page usage (I don't know how to create a "below the fold" effect for my posts) this also is quite instructive. People are coming to the site for the first time, and they're reading it. Not just one entry, but several.

I got my first formal request from someone I don't know already, to add their blog to my blogroll. I blushed. I was tempted to send flattering pictures of myself and say I liked long walks on the beach.

I got my first hit from the Maldives.

"The Maldives is the smallest Asian country in terms of both population and area; it is the smallest predominantly Muslim nation in the world. It is also the country with the lowest highest point in the world."


Perhaps I have achieved that, I am now the "highest low point" in the blogosphere? Getting myself into the top 100,000 in Alexa rankings might be the next vain self centered goal I could set. My wife thinks it should be getting paid for this. I'll go by a winning lotto ticket, and donate it to the blog. Hehehehehehe... Anyone know the winning lotto number? More →

Sphere: Related Content

Wednesday, January 07, 2009

Since the FLDS don't issue FATWAS, it's open season here, and in Canada. It's not a coordinated attack, it's not about (a particular) religion.

This could become very interesting, as the war against the FLDS goes international. Muslims engage in polygyny here, and in Canada, but if you are FLDS and are polygynous, you're a target. (A quick Bountiful Timeline primer from The Vancouver Sun.)

The Globe and Mail - "In a sensational turn in a 20-year-old debate over the issue of polygamy in Canada, police have charged Jim Oler and Winston Blackmore.

The two men were charged each with one count on Tuesday and have not yet appeared in court. Mr. Oler is charged with 'practising polygamy' on Nov. 4, 2004 with two women. Mr. Blackmore is charged with 'practising polygamy' on May 1, 2005, with 22 women."

One is always tempted to make the joke, "how do you practice polygamy?"

"Polygamy is an indictable offence in the Criminal Code."

That may be, but Canada has already legalized (in a sense) Polygamy for the purposes of using divorce laws, to break them up. The Ottawa Sun, May 31st, 2006;

"Multiple-wife marriages have been legally recognized in Canada to award spousal support and inheritance payments.

The former Liberal government long maintained that polygamy is criminal in Canada but documents obtained by Sun Media under Access to Information show that polygamous marriages have been recognized 'for limited purposes' to enforce the financial obligations of husbands.

Religious organizations say same-sex marriage opened the door to decriminalizing polygamy, and worry that formal recognitions of plural marriages will weaken the government's ability to defend the anti-polygamy law if it faces a constitutional challenge on religious grounds. A polygamist from Bountiful, British Columbia has warned he will fight for his constitutional right to have plural wives on religious grounds."

Probably the same "polygamist" arrested today. Canada is not the USA of course, and their judicial system is vastly different. This is blatant hypocrisy. It is of course, not about religion. Well, maybe, but only particular religions, the ones that don't issue fatwas.

Also reporting on the story Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, The Salt Lake Tribune, The Deseret News, ABC News and Google News/The Canadian press.


More →

Sphere: Related Content

Tuesday, January 06, 2009

Routine Swinton "appearance" goes ahead without her appearing.

David Foley showed up and talked to the judge. Her involvement in the Texas case is noted.

KRDO - "Texas Rangers traced a call to her, following the raid of a polygamist compound in April. In that case, a girl named Sarah told a social worker she was trying to escape the religious sect. Swinton has not been charged in that case. The next review of Swinton's case in the El Paso County incident is set for February 4."


Now we know the next date for her next irrelevant or put off non appearance. Yeah, "a girl named Rozita," not Sarah. More →

Sphere: Related Content

(UPDATED) Texas Claims Danger to Merrianne Jessop, by acknowledging there is no danger.

Out here among the wild and dangerous bloggers (yes, we've been noticed and we are dangerous) there has been the constant observation that Merrianne Jessop is not in danger of "further abuse" as defined by the state, because she is Warren Jeff's bride.

So either she is, or she isn't. If she isn't, she wasn't abused or there is no marriage? What gives here?

The Deseret News - "Jessop wants her daughter back, but the report said 'Mrs. Jessop has no plan for how she might protect (the girl) from being placed in another marriage.' "

This complicated statement says that perhaps she will not stay married to Warren Jeffs. How could this be? The precipitating events would be Warren's excommunication from the FLDS church and the forced divorce by the subsequent prophet, of Merrianne and Warren and her subsequent remarriage. I would think these things actually would have to happen first, for the potential abuse to occur, the FLDS do not endorse or practice polyandry.

Does Texas know that Warren is about to be excommunicated? I hardly think that is true. If so, it would probably involve a struggle or crisis over which the FLDS might actually split. The Jessops in this particular case would have to be in the rebelling faction and go against Warren. Is this possible? I think not, emphatically not. Even so the resulting long term struggle would probably take years in which case Merrianne Jessop would grow to the age of consent or adulthood and it would be a moot point.

Do they they Warren is going to kill himself? Several reports have issued from Arizona saying that Warren's actions in jail have been suicidal. I'm not an authority on these reports. I do know that they've claimed he fasts too much, has lost weight and has worn sores on his knees from praying. As to whether or not there are reliable reports he has tried to take his own life? I'd frankly rely on other FLDS members close to him to verify if this was true or not.

It would look as if the state actually recognizes that of all people, while Warren lives, Merrianne Jessop is the most safe out of all the minors that were at YFZ. To counter that reality, they claim that with FLDS beliefs, she could be subjected to another marriage, which is silly. It does acknowledge what we have been saying all along though. All they want to do is keep her. She is now the only girl in state custody and they seek permanent custody of her and will apparently only relent if her mother renounces her faith and/or turns states evidence. This is monstrous.

Apparently WE, the bloggers are now coming under scrutiny. I've wondered about this. A recent story confirmed that Texas was conscious of how they were being perceived in the "media" and the FLDS sympathetic blogosphere is now actively mentioned as a problem.

"The girl has weekly visits with her mother in San Antonio. Recently, more of her siblings were allowed to visit her. She also has weekly phone calls with her mother. CPS complained about letters being sent to the girl originating from a blog, which it said has encouraged people to 'kidnap' the girl from her foster home."

I think I know which blogger this is. I've also been sharply questioned about who I am, and who I represent when I call the state of Texas doing what little investigative reporting I have done.

Let me stress that this is not something I recommend. I would hesitate to suggest what I would recommend at this point as it may well go against the wishes of Merrianne's family. I continue to think this is a case of extortion on the part of Texas, using Merrianne as hostage.

Some UPDATED observations, since I banged this out before I went to work today:

The article also states:

" 'We are still hopeful for reunification in this case, if it can be achieved,' agency spokesman Patrick Crimmins said Monday."

This Orwellian doublespeak, which I alluded to earlier, is code language for Barbara Jessop renouncing her faith and probably turning states evidence. Back in the summer I observed that children had become threatened hostages being used for leverage against their mothers. Merrianne Jessop is a case in point. If her mother were to turn state's evidence and renounce her belief, I'm sure she'd get Merrianne back. The state employs the sophistry that she might be married again, to form the basis of keeping her.

"The major concerns were that Mrs. Jessop does not believe that abuse to (the girl) happened, she does not take responsibility for her role in that abuse, she is dependent on people that had involvement in the abuse to (the girl), she does not have a plan to protect (the girl) other than her promise, she is minimally cooperative with CPS and seems to be deliberately misleading CPS about her marriage to Frederick Merril Jessop," the report said.

And;

The CPS report said Jessop "has not demonstrated herself as a safe and responsible caregiver."

The state is saying abuse has in fact occurred, if Barbara Jessop disagrees, she is not a responsible and safe caregiver. If she agrees, to get her child back, she'd have to turn on her family. I emphasize that a trial has not occurred yet from the perspective of CPS, guilt has been administratively established. This is how child abuse laws and the accompanying enforcement agencies are being used to circumvent law. It is particularly noxious that CPS is still using the notion that belief constitutes abuse, which means that the State must certify your religions beliefs about sexuality. Fine you say? Yes, for those of you who object to FLDS practices like "child marriage" and polygyny, but the next step, not too far away is holding your children hostage until you accept homosexuality, for teaching against it will be deemed "abuse."

"(Merrianne) is doing well in foster care, the report claims.

'(Merrianne Jessop) has kept busy with piano, schoolwork and reading,' it said. 'The foster family continues to expose (Merrianne) to new things through outings, family gatherings and other social activities.'

In therapy, the report said (Merrianne) expressed sadness at not being around her family. Attempts to find relatives to care for her have not worked out, CPS said, noting one did not believe the girl had been abused and 'agrees with underage marriage and supports plural marriages.' "

And;

"A psychological evaluation in September described her as 'moderately guarded and suspicious' and recommended more therapy sessions."

Things to note. They continue to question Merrianne about her beliefs with regard to polygyny. This will be used as evidence that she is to sick to go back to her abusive environment. They are forcing or attempting to force a 14 year old to give up her religion. Also in the report, it states that when they get full custody, they will have the right to make religious choices for her.

"Permanent managing conservatorship would give CPS widespread authority over the girl under Texas law, including the right to decide care, education, medical care, legal rights, the right to consent to a marriage and even direct the 'moral and religious training of the child.' "

Again, I stress this is the decertification of a religion. The state must approve what you belief. The state fully acknowledges that parents have the right to instruct their children in religion and will take over those duties only when the child is in their conservatorship. This meant Barbara Jessop has that right now, she just believes the wrong things. Are the nations Muslims going to be rounded up and deprived of their children? They also believe that plural marriage is morally right and teach that. As evidence by the behavior of their own prophet, they believe that "underage marriage" is correct. Bill makes the excellent point that this is proof the raid was about religion, and has been all along.

Merrianne is also under real stress. Rumors continue to filter back that she is failing emotionally, but the state cheerily pronounces that her brain washing is having no negative effects. They confirm the rumors obliquely by stating she "expresses sadness." They also confirm she has not given up her beliefs. I know as a parent when I disagree with a child and persistently lobby them that they change, they begin to shut down and become sullen and angry. Sadness is often repressed anger, and leads to depression. This is a clear statement that Merrianne is not well, despite the doublespeak.

More →

Sphere: Related Content

Monday, January 05, 2009

Deep Thoughts now in the Senate?

I admit it, the specter of Al Franken in the US Senate is even more repulsive to me than Obama as President. On election night, Norm Coleman seemingly won re-election by about 775 votes. Now the total has flipped 1100 votes in favor of Al.

The Wall Street Journal - "Under Minnesota law, election officials are required to make a duplicate ballot if the original is damaged during Election Night counting. Officials are supposed to mark these as 'duplicate' and segregate the original ballots. But it appears some officials may have failed to mark ballots as duplicates, which are now being counted in addition to the originals. This helps explain why more than 25 precincts now have more ballots than voters who signed in to vote. By some estimates this double counting has yielded Mr. Franken an additional 80 to 100 votes."


Why is it that we believe random error favors Republican Candidates and perpetual recounting moves us towards the "truth," which is, a Democrat won? This supposes in reality, an evil force that twists elections like Gremlins or Leprechauns during the process and always in favor of the Dark Side, which would be conservative candidates, or in the case of Norm Coleman, candidates more conservative than Al Franken.

Even the Wall Street Journal shows what pantywaists conservatives are when it comes to process because, instead of taking election night totals (unofficial I know) and noting the full size of the swing, they take another total, 215, which is a total most conservative observers view as already containing the first onslaughts of fraud.

Election totals are always a near universal canvas of the whole. The idea that we can accurately count every vote makes for nice soundbites, but it's impossible. Even if it were possible, we'd never know we did it. In polling statistics, error rates center around the size and randomness of the sample or how representative it is of the whole. We then here error rates of plus or minus 5% or 3% depending on the size of the sample.

On election night though, all the ballots are cast. They may not all be counted, and in fact we can be certain that they are not, but all of them are in fact cast. The count so closely approaches the whole that error rate has to be considered almost non existent. You can count on the notion that the ballots erroneously excluded from the count will fall neither on one candidates side, or the other at a rate different that the voting total, as counted.

Putting it another way, you can be certain that if due diligence is the same, across the board, that if there were 1000 ballots not counted, and one candidate got 43.11 percent of the vote total that was counted, and the other got 43.09 percent of the votes that were counted, that you would have about 429 - 433 uncounted votes for each candidate. The larger the uncounted vote total, the more it would match the total as a whole. The idea that Al Franken could make up 1100 votes in a recount is fanciful. It is only slightly less fanciful that Al Franken could make up 440.

There are some vote pools that tend one way, or the other. In some states like Florida, which has a large number of military personel, absentee ballots swing conservative. A large number of uncounted absentee ballots could swing the vote one way or the other, for that reason. It depends on why the voters in a state vote absentee.

Another thing to keep in mind is that in districts that tend to vote heavily one ideology or another, the elections officials also tend to mirror that ideology. If any hanky panky goes on, it's generally controlled in favor of the party in control in that district. What the Journal points out is that more votes have been counted in the precincts accounting for most of Al Franken's gains, than people who voted. Votes were counted twice. It also seems as if a sort of deliberately slack set of standards in those precincts made that fraud possible. Believing that Al Franken made up this kind of ground also requires that you believe that the Gremlins attack Democrat controlled districts only, and need to be exorcised by recounts, for the truth to be known.

With the thin Republican membership of the Senate, they still have a sort of veto power over the Obama Administration, if they stick together. One rogue Republican on each cloture vote means they have no power at all, if Al Franken maintains his theft of this election. The sort of thing that has happened in Minnesota is treason, it should be punishable by death. It won't be, and Republicans will roll over and play dead I am afraid, and lose this one and the media will not even attach the name "controversial" to Al Franken's supposed election. More →

Sphere: Related Content

I'm just sayin', how do we know it's an Ice Age?

Why not call it the Big Chill or the Nippy era?

I dunno, BECAUSE OF ALL THE ICE???

"Thanks to a rapid rebound in recent months, global sea ice levels now equal those seen 29 years ago, when the year 1979 also drew to a close.

Ice levels had been tracking lower throughout much of 2008, but rapidly recovered in the last quarter. In fact, the rate of increase from September onward is the fastest rate of change on record, either upwards or downwards. "


Global warming, set back 30 years. How can this be with record burning of fossil fuel and the destruction we are causing to the environment? If they really cause the temperature to go up, maybe we ought to consider emitting MORE greenhouse gasses.

"Sea ice is floating and, unlike the massive ice sheets anchored to bedrock in Greenland and Antarctica, doesn't affect ocean levels. However, due to its transient nature, sea ice responds much faster to changes in temperature or precipitation and is therefore a useful barometer of changing conditions.

Earlier this year, predictions were rife that the North Pole could melt entirely in 2008. Instead, the Arctic ice saw a substantial recovery. Bill Chapman, a researcher with the UIUC's Arctic Center, tells DailyTech this was due in part to colder temperatures in the region. Chapman says wind patterns have also been weaker this year. Strong winds can slow ice formation as well as forcing ice into warmer waters where it will melt."

Maybe AlGore should start talking again, or stop. I'm confused. If all the politicians just quit talking about Global Warming, wouldn't that reduce the wind rate and preserve arctic ice? I'm just trying to help here.

More →

Sphere: Related Content

Misinformation about FLDS "Welfare Fraud," There isn't any.

I believed it too, back in the day. The number of things I "knew" about the FLDS that it turns out I didn't know, make me fact check just about everything that comes across my desk. I apply more rigor now

I admit, to the claims of the state, than I do those of the FLDS, as they have never lied to me. The closest they have gotten to lying is to go silent when you're close to a problem area. That's not a lie. So, what about that "Welfare Fraud" I used to by into called "Bleeding the Beast?" (Hat Tip Religion News Blog)

The Salt Lake Tribune - "None of the 600 or so residents of the Yearning For Zion Ranch received any form of welfare, according to state officials. Cash assistance is almost nonexistent in the twin towns of Hildale, Utah, and Colorado City, Ariz.

While many families living in the sect's traditional home base receive food and medical help, virtually all those families qualify under program guidelines, authorities say. There has been a single fraud case prosecuted in the past decade.

Yet six speakers at a July 24 Senate Judiciary Committee hearing -- from Sen. Majority Leader Harry Reid to former plural wife Carolyn Jessop -- said fraud and misuse of welfare funds is a primary reason the federal government should be more involved in investigating the sect.

Reid said the FLDS have a 'sophisticated, wealthy and vast criminal organization' that includes 'welfare fraud.' "


That's just pandering at best, at worst it's irresponsible demogoguing ignorance on Senator Reid's part. He either knows and is lying, or doesn't know (and you have to know when you don't really know) and is just shooting his mouth off. This is not to say there is no welfare fraud involving FLDS members but for the FLDS to be engaged in Welfare Fraud, as a form of organized crime, it would have to be systematic and widespread. It's not. Individual members have been apprehended for the crime, but that just says they're not perfect, like we're not perfect. What a shock.

"Jared Barlow pled guilty in August to a second-degree felony while Linda Barlow pled guilty to a misdemeanor charge. They were ordered to repay $37,319 to the Utah Department of Workforce Services and complete community service.

'This is the only (prosecution) I am aware of in the past three years,' said Jerry D. Jaeger, deputy attorney with the Washington County Attorney's Office.

Curt Stewart, spokesman for the Utah Department of Workforce Services, said public perception is that welfare fraud is rampant in the polygamous community. But, he added, 'We are not finding that.'

Ezra Draper, a former FLDS member who lives in the community, called the claim the sect has a doctrine requiring use of government aid 'comical.'

'Bleeding the beast' came from outside (the sect),' he said. "It's not their phraseology.'

FLDS spokesman Willie Jessop said the term has only been used by 'anti-FLDS crusaders.' "


There is the feature of the occasional "Cash Assistance" need being a larger claim for FLDS members, because their families are bigger, but the incidence of such claims is not atypical.

"Based on number of recipients, 44 percent of Colorado City residents received food stamps -- not 78 percent, as a guide put together by the Utah Attorney General's Office states. Arizona provided $1.5 million in food stamps to area residents in 2006 and 2007.

Utah did not provide information about recipient numbers. But the average monthly food stamp benefit in Hildale is $829, compared with the typical monthly grant of $250 in Washington County.

As for fraud, Arizona has not prosecuted anyone in Colorado City for misuse of federal or state aid programs, according to a spokeswoman for Attorney General Terry Goddard."


Even the Utah's office of the Attorney General gets into the misinformation act, inflating the numbers by nearly 100%.

Religion News Blog then remembered a "Larry King" interview on CNN with an FLDS member, and at the end, John Quiñones chimes in brightly;

"Yes. It’s called bleeding the beast. The American federal system. When we were there, we found many folks who were on not only welfare and food stamps but also property taxes not being paid and lawsuits filed on that. They’re finally cracking down, the authorities, because dozens and dozens of folks who live in that community aren’t paying property taxes."

And there you have it, the echoes never stop. As Mark Twain said, a lie can travel half way around the world before the truth even gets it's shoes on. In the end, you have a group so hated that no one cares about them, and so they will turn a blind eye when they are done injustices. All we want, is to see someone "get them" and for them to go away.

When confronted with the "inflation" of numbers, Paul Murphy of the Utah Attorney General's office just goes back on the attack. Again, the Salt Lake Tribune.

"(W)hile there may not be 'outright fraud' by the polygamous community, there is 'a resentment that taxpayers are being used to support this lifestyle.' "

That you create Paul. Unless the State of Utah can make the case that the FLDS represent, as a group, a larger burden to state social services or the tax roles or to the Federal Government than the population at large, they are part of the solution, not part of the problem. Anecdotal stories do not a case make, only proving that the FLDS systematically defraud is important. It would seem, they do not.

More →

Sphere: Related Content

Sunday, January 04, 2009

"In Our Opinion" the San Angelo Standard-Times supports Wildcat Search and Seizure. Stalin & Castro proud.

The gullibility of the press (in general) continues to be vexing. Here, the San Angelo Standard-Times takes a healthy swig of KoolAid that colors all that on which they report and opine. They correctly identify the issues, and then do no reporting whatsoever and make the State Sponsored Conclusion.

"The scope of the case - the largest of its kind in U.S. history - should make it easier to understand why the investigation was carried out imperfectly, beginning with the fact it originated from a phone call alleging abuse now believed to be a hoax. That doesn't exonerate the perpetrators any more than if police responding to a shoplifting complaint went to the wrong address and found a bank robbery in progress."


This is precisely the formulation that would make prosecution of the FLDS valid. Except, it's not true. If they would read opinions and research critical of CPS, they would not draw such conclusions. I have only to point to my own work, here at this blog. Yes, I understand the issue, for I have made the same comparisons to both bank robbery and murder found while investigating other crimes.

We now know that a considerable force was assembled prior to the raid, which was in essence, a domestic violence call.

We now know that the basis of that response, overwrought or not, was eroded while the police were at the gate with considerable force backing them up, dictating a near apocalyptic outcome, had the FLDS correctly chosen to resist an illegal entry into their own homes. By "correctly" I mean that they were entirely within their rights to resist. They were being invaded, illegally. Sheriff David Doran had a small military force at his disposal and he was going in. Doran contacted the alleged perpetrator while at the gate and had every reason to believe that the call was in fact a hoax, the perpetrator was not, and had not been at the Ranch, ever, and furthermore, Law Enforcement believed that. They are quoted as saying "Well, that takes care of half the problem. Now we need to find this Sarah Jessop Barlow." If you believe that the alleged victim hasn't given you accurate information about who her husband is, why do you believe she has given you accurate information about who she is, or even where she is? In the meantime FLDS men are pointing out that the call should be traced. These are men that believe that a traced call will exonerate them. Sheriff Doran must believe it will too, because he proceeds, time now, is not his friend.

Sheriff Doran wanted to believe something was "going on." This is the KoolAid of the YFZ raid. The only thing accurate about the San Angelo Standard-Times editorial analysis is the idea that Law Enforcement was at the wrong address. If the perp is correctly identified, and is correctly believed to be out of state and never in the state, the only logical conclusion about Sarah Jessop Barlow's story is that she sincerely thinks she's in Texas, but isn't. Furthermore they have the now increasingly reliable testimony of the men at the gate that she isn't there. They correctly have told you the perp isn't there, and they're telling you the victim is not there.

Next, there is the Eldorado Report itself. This gives further lie to the idea that a bank robbery was in progress. Since the report does not cite seeing pregnant teenage girls, or children with children, but instead interviews as setting up the basis for continued police action, the progress of the raid is now described like this. I can do no more than to cite the report in it's entirety. The claim of such a basis is not there.

  • False premise for entry, believed but not properly investigated.
  • Massive confrontation, planned for, but not needed. There was no violence at the Ranch.
  • Belated investigation at the gate of the Ranch where the story begins to fall apart.
  • Entry based on overwhelming force that cannot be contested. The FLDS have no private army or security force.
  • A subsequent failure to find anything pertaining to the cause for entry.
  • Refusing to leave Law Enforcement begins to ask questions that have nothing to do with the raid. This is not a crime seen while at the Ranch, this is looking for a crime not the subject of the warrant and not in evidence.
  • The destruction of property.
  • Forced armed entry into private residences.
  • Forced entry into a place of worship.
  • Forcible confiscation of private records, to form the basis for crimes not in evidence that Texas now desperately needs to justify it's baseless raid.

What is disgusting about this editorial claim is that it makes no case. It simply asserts that if any wrongdoing is ultimately alleged with any basis whatsoever, that Law Enforcement can be excused for anything they did. It makes no attempt to prove any point, it simply asserts that it, is The San Angelo Standard-Times. It knows. You don't need to question them. Accept that it is true. After all, they got everything from The Government, it must be true.

The title of the opinion piece states "CPS Report Clearly Shows FLDS Abuse." At this point what the report shows is that the Pregnancy Rate among FLDS teen girls is lower than the national average. It's lower than that of Texas. It's probably lower than that of San Angelo or Scheicher county.

Stalin is said to have made the trains run on time. I'm sure Hitler, or Mussolini or Tito or Castro could all have found the abuses of any group had they wished to find them. If your family, or mine looked "suspicious" then those all powerful states could produce their kind of justice, any time.

The FLDS could not survive in Castro's Cuba by keeping what they do out of sight, the mere suspicion that the FLDS were engaged in child abuse would produce a midnight raid where everyone was turned out of their homes, isolated from one another, their houses ransacked, their children placed in foster care, their parents jailed, questioned, and everything searched. DNA evidence would not be asked for, it would be taken. Why are we not outraged that this is almost precisely what happened? In the end, the FLDS could hope that it would not have been an object of a political arrest, because it would be all over. Their crimes, if any, would be discovered. Their crimes, if not those suspected, would be found. The Standard-Times is concluding that there was abuse because the CPS report says so. Because, ultimately, Texas Wildcat Evidence Drilling project hit an oil pocket, the whole raid is justified.

In our country, searching for crimes is not Wildcatting. Searching for crimes by Wildcat searching is the province of dictatorships. Somewhere, Stalin is smiling. More →

Sphere: Related Content

Saturday, January 03, 2009

Jimmy Carter is also a Lousy Carpenter.

Was there anything President Carter did right?

The London Times - "Fairway Oaks was built on northern Florida wasteland by 10,000 volunteers, including (Former President Jimmy) Carter, in a record 17-day 'blitz' organised by the charity Habitat for Humanity.

Eight years later it is better known for cockroaches, mildew and mysterious skin rashes.

A forthcoming legal battle over Fairway Oaks threatens the reputation of a charity envied for the calibre of its celebrity supporters, who range from Johnny Depp and Brad Pitt to Colin Firth, Christian Bale and Helena Bonham Carter.

The case could challenge the bedrock philosophy behind Habitat for Humanity, claiming that using volunteers, rather than professional builders, is causing as many problems as it solves."

Either it's a case of incompentance, where the builders picked, can't build, or it's a case of you can't help certain people. In either case, why bother? The case for incompetence.

"One man pulled up his floorboards to find rubbish 5ft deep under his kitchen. Other complaints include cracking walls and rotting door frames that let in rats and ants. Many residents have complained of mildew and mysterious skin rashes."

Holy Love Canal President Jimmy! One charitable neighbor suggested the homeowners simply get a lawyer (they're poor, right?) or use bleach. Maybe that's the right though, that the hand that fed, shouldn't be bitten, but it's a mess, isn't it?

More →

Sphere: Related Content

Proposed Alternatives to Sola Scriptura

Oh, I like this one. More →

Sphere: Related Content

The Monument of Cain, first born of Adam?

Cain, is hardly a sympathetic figure in scripture. He sulks after the rejection of his offering, but Cain, as Abel and his parents do, converses directly with God regarding all. In this way he is somewhat to be envied since we all sin, but the word of God is scarce in these days. When I say "why?" I must search the scriptures. Cain could take his whines to God. In fact, he could sulk and God would walk over to him and ask him "what's wrong?"

"The Lord said to Cain, 'Why are you angry, and why has your face fallen? If you do well, will you not be accepted? And if you do not do well, sin is crouching at the door. Its desire is for you, but you must rule over it'." (ESV)


Ever the angry child, working out not generations of sinful build up, but purely his own, Cain moves from divine revelation, to further sin.

"Cain spoke to Abel his brother. And when they were in the field, Cain rose up against his brother Abel and killed him."


After trying to cover up his deed to an all knowing God, Cain is sentenced to wander and to be a fugitive. Cain sees his own death in his murderous guilt, lamenting that whoever finds him, will destroy him. God however shows love for Cain and preserves him.

"Then the Lord said to him, 'Not so! If anyone kills Cain, vengeance shall be taken on him sevenfold.' And the Lord put a mark on Cain, lest any who found him should attack him. Then Cain went away from the presence of the Lord and settled in the land of Nod, east of Eden."


To think that Cain at least, did not know of the LORD, is folly. To think his children did not either, is also error. Cain conversed with God, he bore God's preserving mark, but his immediate punishment is to dwell away from the LORD, instead of in his close presence. Cain's line goes by an inferior path of inheritance, like Ishmael, like Canaan, like Esau. All these men go these paths for different reasons, but they walk out of the story line of the Bible, and into relative obscurity.

One of the bookends of Cain's story is God's promise to him that he will be avenged if he is himself killed, a promise echoed at the other end of Cain's line, for Cain's patrilinear line dies, in the flood. How then, is Cain remembered? He is driven from his home, his genealogy is known from male descendant to male descendant. Most likely, and almost certainly it is not written down, but witnessed to from one generation to the next. It is said that Noah could have known (and probably did know) a man that knew Adam. Noah's knowledge of Adam is second hand, probably witnessed to by more than one man, likewise Cain's line would be similarly confirmed, from Cain forward. In fact we have more detail about Cain than we have about the "Godly Line of Seth" and any of it's members. What is the most likely meaning in terms of genealogy? Cain separates from Seth and Adam. The confirming witnesses of his line look back not to Adam, but to Cain. One of the two bookends of his story.

Fast forward to Lamech, who recites the protection of Cain to his witnesses, his wives.

"Lamech said to his wives: 'Adah and Zillah, hear my voice; you wives of Lamech, listen to what I say: I have killed a man for wounding me, a young man for striking me. If Cain's revenge is sevenfold, then Lamech's is seventy-sevenfold.' "


Ofttimes this is interpreted to mean that Lamech is a bad man, but we do know why he killed. He killed in self defense. Lamech seems to then claim the protections of God, the inheritance of Cain, passed down to him. He has killed two men (possibly just one, these references could be to the same man) and asserts that his protection ought to be greater as a result. His frame of reference genealogically speaking, is Cain. Cain, the inferior father of all his line, unlike Seth's whose father present and with him, is Adam. It's not much to claim but Lamech claims it and does what all men do in these times, he recites it orally to his family. His witnesses are his wives. Perhaps even, these are his dying words, the recitation of his inheritance. How then is Cain preserved, if he is to die in the flood?

In conversations with a close friend we have mulled over this point for a while. No woman is mentioned by name from Adam and Eve to Noah except for Lamech's wives and daughter. He is the father of Naamah, husband to Adah and Zillah. Suddenly detail blossoms and we have not one woman mentioned, but three. The words of Seth are not recorded in his line, only those of Adam his father and Eve, his mother. None of the words of the men between Lamech the Father of Noah (not Lamech, the father of Naamah, Cain, Jubal and Tubal-cain) are recorded, but like the other Lamech, Noah's father's words are recorded. He says of his son Noah;

"Out of the ground that the Lord has cursed this one shall bring us relief from our work and from the painful toil of our hands."


Lamech, the father of Noah looks forward, Lamech, the father of Naamah, back. This is fitting, for the patrilinear line of Cain is about to die. But instead of the differences, let us look upon the similarities. Words at the beginning of an age are recorded, and words at their end. Noah knows the words of Lamech his father, because he hears them. How though, does he know the words of Naamah's father, the other Lamech, descendent of Cain? How does he know the genealogy? It would be lost to the line of Seth. Intermarriages between Seth's line, and Cain's line would retain their own patrilinear records passed from one generation to the next, emphasizing the family name, Seth. Why do we even know Naamah's name, much less the detail of her generation?

It is because she did not die in the flood. Naamah was on the ark. Naamah brought with her the story of her line, and someone who loved her, preserved it. That man would be her husband. That man is almost certainly Noah. Cain's name is not transcendent, but in a lesser way, Cain goes on, to this day, in all of us, for Naamah like Eve, is our mother.

Once again, this is an educated guess, but I would not bet against it. After coming to this conclusion without outside help, and marveling for a long time that such detail is given to the last in Cain's line, it suddenly dawned on me what the most likely explanation was. Knowing that if only I saw this, it would likely be a falsehood, I then began to research the names of Noah's family and their wives. Lo and behold, it is an ancient Hebrew Tradition, in Midrash, that Naamah is the wife of Noah. I am not alone.

Movies increasingly tell the popular stories of our time. From one of them, a 1992 movie script and remake of a popular American Novel by James Fenimore Cooper, there is this line uttered by Hawkeye about those who are gone, almost without a trace, and who live only as a memory;

"My father's people say that at the birth of the sun and of his brother the moon, their mother died. So the sun gave to the earth her body, from which was to spring all life. And he drew forth from her breast the stars, and the stars he threw into the night sky to remind him of her soul. So there's the Cameron's monument. My folks' too, I guess."

Bad theology, I know. Awful in fact, but if I felt any way at all in stumbling across one of my first grandmothers, that I never knew was there, it was that feeling. Scattered somewhere I will never know, is my mother from before the flood. When I look up at the stars it will seem that Naamah is memorialized there. Naamah (who else would it be?) speaks only of the greatness of her family, the accomplishments of her brothers, and not her own.

"Lamech took two wives. The name of the one was Adah, and the name of the other Zillah. Adah bore Jabal; he was the father of those who dwell in tents and have livestock. His brother's name was Jubal; he was the father of all those who play the lyre and pipe. Zillah also bore Tubal-cain; he was the forger of all instruments of bronze and iron. The sister of Tubal-cain was Naamah."


Who else would remember and who else would know? Everyone in this story is important, Lamech a patriarch, mothers of the great inventors of their age, all of them having names. The only distinction of Naamah? She has a name. She is Cain's monument. More →

Sphere: Related Content

Friday, January 02, 2009

Another Record Month

Again, measuring by the less than perfect measure of "Blogflux," I hit another milestone. In November this blog experienced a 33% increase to hit 4000 unique visitors. Last month, a 25% increase to hit 5000. I think had I paid less attention to a couple of forum debates, I would have gone a bit farther.

This continues to amaze me since I believed this fall, things would, well, fall off and The Modern Pharisee would die back to a sort of borderline blog status with a few followers. We will see what 2009 brings.

All of this motivated me to tweak my Google analytic tools so that I could follow the traffic a little better. I'm starting to know as a result what's going on in the guts of my blog template. I'm a little phobic when it comes to the tech side, but I'm getting over it. I've noticed running Google analytics next to Blogflux a see a few more recorded hits. Don't ask me why. More →

Sphere: Related Content

Thursday, January 01, 2009

It is important, to remember how the raid started. It is damning.

From The Truth Will Prevail, the account of what happened at YFZ.

"A little before 6:00 p.m. on April 3, an APC (armored personnel carrier), two police cars, a cargo-carrier van, and a black Ford Expedition moved into position on the Griffin property north of the YFZ Ranch. Soon a SWAT team was hunkered down behind the APC in full gear, including body armor, helmets, face masks, machine guns, and other weapons.

At about the same time close to thirty police cars and unmarked vehicles arrived at the main gate to the Ranch."


Law enforcement is prepared for an armed confrontation. At the very least, they are prepared to veto any attempt to resist or escape, they have come prepared for battle, and have surrounded YFZ. If they really think "Sarah" is still there, a suggestion that they have been staking out the FLDS for a few days prior in some way shape or form, has credibility. They would have to watch them to know that their "evidence" is still at the ranch.

"The men (of YFZ) told the officers (at the gate) that there was no Sarah Jessop Barlow in the community and asked whether the call had been traced to be sure that it was coming from the Ranch."


FLDS men are clearly dubious. They demand to know if there is probable cause. Did the call come from the community? Yes, you can trace the number they assert. This is true. Yes you can identify what cell tower was involved with the call from that number. Clearly this could be done, clearly with the FLDS surrounded there is no danger of escape. The FLDS ask pointedly if "due diligence" has been done.

"When the sheriff replied that the number was blocked so that the call couldn’t be traced, the men said they understood there was technology available to get past a blocked number and that the whole thing sounded like a prank call, probably a Flora Mae Jessop deal. Doran dodged the issue and claimed that he had seen the locations described in the calls and that the caller would have to be inside the ranch to have included so many details."


Sheriff Doran later claims to have an informant on the Ranch, he claims to know the call must have come from inside, because of detail. This is all very disturbing because if no one can know this sort of detail, except for Doran, and for the FLDS themselves, then how does "Sarah" know details that make her story convincing? Sheriff Doran is now squarely on the hot spot for having spilled details himself, or lying about how authentic they are. He still has a chance to "holster" his weapon, and back down. But he doesn't.

"There is ample evidence, however, that the Texas authorities knew, or should have known, that the calls on which their search warrant was based were bogus. Between March 29 and April 5, sixteen calls were placed to the Newbridge Family Shelter in San Angelo, Texas, from the alleged 'Sarah.' Such calls were still going on while the raid was in progress. The same phone number was used to call a battered women’s shelter in Washington State numerous times between March 22 and April 8 with a similar story. There is no evidence, however, that a small army was assembled for an investigation anywhere but in Texas."


This is also a critical point. "Sarah" is calling all over the place. Arizona disregarded a similar call, Utah disregarded a similar call, "Sarah" continues to call Texas. Only in Texas is a small army assembled to respond to a call that now has real reason to be suspected as bogus. They have the technology to investigate the calls origins, and to see where they are coming from, but they aren't interested. They're only interested in one thing, getting in. And they're in a hurry. Is it because over time, it will be discovered that the cause does not exist, and the warrant is questionable? If so, these are men trying to create a massive distraction to cover up for the fact they have overstepped.

"It is a well-known fact that these calls have since been linked to a 33-year-old African American woman in Colorado Springs named Rozita Swinton, who has a history of making false reports of sexual abuse."


It is well known to Texas, and well known to those that do know, that they won't admit it. Most people in the United States are not familiar with her and at best, still only regard her as a suspect in a possibly fraudulent call, if they know that much. What the public "knows" is more along the lines of what an Obama voter knew about who controlled congress. In fact, I'd have to say an Obama voter was better informed. Texas is banking on this and continues to bank on this ignorance.

"The brother of Dale Evans Barlow, alleged husband of 'Sarah,' arrived at the gate of the ranch about 7:15 p.m. and told the officers that no one in his brother’s family was named Sarah Jessop. He said that Dale did not live on the ranch and had never been there. By this time the officers had obtained Dale’s cell-phone number, and Sheriff Doran and Captain Caver of the Rangers went to the sheriff’s vehicle and talked to Dale, who lives in Colorado City, Arizona, and had not even been in Texas since a school trip in 1977. Dale gave the officers his driver’s license number to verify his identity."


Normally, this would give a neutral person cause to pause. There is no neutrality. You don't call in an army to ask questions. All they want is to get inside. Any excuse will do, and it is becoming rapidly evident that there isn't even an excuse. For the raid that they are determined to justify, Texas now knows they will have to get inside. Normally, when confronted with confident people, resisiting you who present facts that constantly are born out by investigation, you slow down. Texas cannot slow down, it would be too embarrassing, and they'll probably never get in again, as evidenced by the subsequent attempt to return to the ranch in May. They KNOW this. They MUST get in, or they will NEVER get in.

This is persuasive proof that they were there for the abuses they suspected were going on at the ranch, but had no evidence for. It's no longer important if "Sarah" exists, I would have to say at this point even if there was no conspiracy to manufacture evidence, that Sheriff Doran is feeling the hot prickly adrenalin warning that he's wrong. He now has two choices. Back off and be embarrassed to the point of maybe losing his job, or charge in and "find something." Anything.

"Dale Barlow’s April telephone record from South Central Communications shows two calls from the same number in Texas at 6:20:42 p.m. and 6:24:59 p.m. MST on April 3. There are no other calls on the record from or to Texas. After the conversation the officers remarked as they returned to the gate, 'Well, that takes care of half the problem. Now we need to find this Sarah Jessop Barlow.' "


The "Perp" is not there. Texas believes he is not there. They have every reason to believe he has never been there. This speech pattern is the speech pattern of someone determined to do a thing, not of someone who is listening. They are literally saying they choose to beleive the other two thirds of the story now told by a liar. Why? Because they want in.

I have been fired in my lifetime. I have sat before men who accused me of things that I summarily proved did not occur. Nothing changed, they were there to fire me, the reasons they gave were merely the excuse, window dressing. I have also confronted CPS myself, at the gate, figuratively speaking. I know that aggressive and confidently assured presentation causes investigators to think. The CPS did not come to my house because I presented them with all the evidence. They blustered, told me they could come anyway and I couldn't do anything about it. I told them they could, but it would be over my dead body because nothing that they had proposed had happened, and I wouldn't let them in my home. They investigated and called me back and angrily derided me for my confrontational attitude, but they never came. Texas did not stop because they were convinced that once inside, they could justify their raid. They also had the firepower to enforce their behavior. In my case had someone shown up, it wouldn't have been with a swat team, and that, made them cautious.

It is, as is said in this article and elsewhere, a fishing expedition. They were also sure they wouldn't get hurt. They were sure, though without evidence, that they would find something. With 430 children, yes, they would if they searched everywhere and everyone. More →

Sphere: Related Content