Showing posts with label Texas Lies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Texas Lies. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 03, 2009

Just in case you think Teresa Steed is Acting for effect.

You think the FLDS "teen" who has a child is blowing this out of proportion? Is she pandering to sympathy? Shouldn't she trust the state's motives?


Just because they lie to her is no reason for her to play tricks on them to keep the baby away from the state is it?
The Salt Lake Tribune - "The state and attorneys for the girl and her mother agreed in November to a 'meet and greet' where caseworkers could observe the infant, not take DNA, he said.

But representatives of the Texas Attorney General's Office also showed up and performed the test.

'We don't know what their motives are but one thing we do know is it's not about protecting [the girl] or her baby,' Jessop said."
I always wonder why such facts are not reported at the time they were learned. I have a tendency to read most relevant articles on the topic, perhaps I missed it. Here Brooke Adams reveals that Teresa Steed shows up for the "meet and greet" (why she has to do this, I don't know) and we find trust is the first thing to be violated. All it was, was a sham to get DNA from the child.

Texas is not treating any of these children, as children and is not concerned for their well being beyond keeping them alive for evidence harvesting (the child) or hostage taking (Merrianne Jessop, Teresa Jeffs). They have no concern for their person, for their futures or for their happiness or health. They're TISSUE SAMPLES in an EVIDENCE locker.

After Teresa Steed has been lied to once by Texas Brown Shirts, why wouldn't she play games with them the next time? She clearly believes that whatever meeting it is that the state wishes to have, is misrepresented as to reason. They want the child. She doesn't want them to have the child.
More →

Sphere: Related Content

Friday, January 23, 2009

Other end of the Old Boy FLDS - Rozita Swinton Network?

Apparently, it is a Ranger Philip Kemp
with the Texas Rangers, who contacts the FBI on the 11th of April, 2008. I will research this more. It means the chain is now:

  1. Texas Ranger Philip Kemp
  2. (Unknown FBI agent working out of San Angelo)
  3. Agent Steve A. Smith - FBI Colorado Springs Office
  4. Lt. Sean Mandel (then a Sgt on detached duty from CSPD to the FBI)
  5. Sgt. Hugh Velasquez CSPD
  6. Detective Terry Thrumston CSPD
More →

Sphere: Related Content

Friday, January 16, 2009

UPDATED (new information): Redacting Sarah and other Observations on the Jeffs motion.

Wait for it, because the biggest news is that the REDACTING of this motion, amounts to half of the big news. We'll get to that later. UPDATED AGAIN: Now from reading the Mohave Daily News, it would seem that Piccarreta is claiming Texas did know about Rozita Swinton
.

When the hearing on Evidentiary issues comes up, we have a lot of insight into what the issues will be. A lot is revealed about what occurred in the Depositions in December. One is, that Brooks Long, got promoted. Forgive me if this has been noted before, but I wasn't aware of it. Texas Ranger Brooks Long was a Sergeant. Now he is a Lieutenant. Incidental I know. Perhaps a pat on the back for a patsy.

"Once the defendant has made the required prima facia, the state bears the burden of proving that the evidentiary hearing in this matter if it (is) willing to concede the unconstitutionality of the search because the State will not have met its burden."


Here Warren's attorneys claim to have made the prima facia case. Later in the motion several instances of how that case has been made, will be brought up. This then shifts the burden of proof to the State of Arizona (if I read this rightly) and that is what the hearing they request is all about. It's saying "the ball is in your court" and of course, the only way to answer is "in court." Hence the need for a hearing. Next to note is the menu of items that disquiet Warren's attorneys.


"The principle constitutional issues (there are many sub-issues) that must be addressed at the upcoming hearings are:

  • Overbreadth of the warrants
  • Whether the search actually conducted exceeded the permissible scope of the warrants
  • Whether law enforcement officers acted with reckless disregard as to the false information in the search warrant affidavits
  • Whether, under the totality of circumstances, the information from the unknown caller provided probable cause for the issuance of the warrants
  • Whether the exposure of Arizona law enforcement officials to the illegally seized evidence has tainted the present proceedings"

Warren's attorneys also point out in a footnote that the single residence theory was not believed by Doran or Long. This was ascertained in the December Depositions.

"Schleicher County Sheriff Doran and Texas Ranger Sgt. (now Lt.) Long were aware that there were multiple residences on the nearly 1,700 acre FLDS premises, and they searched all of them anyway. [Doran Interview, December 18, 2008. p. 6; Long Interview, December 18, 2008, p. 50]."


They immediately exceeded the scope of the warrant, obtaining DNA. Exceeding it in a way that "the magistrate" had intentionally removed. It seems they had an agenda, and even a willing Judge could not restrain their actions.

"The defendant has also produced evidence showing that Texas Law enforcement officials refused to obey the dictates of the warrant under whose authority they were purportedly acting by seizing DNA samples, bucal swabs, blood samples, and pubic hair, that the magistrate expressly struck from the warrant."


The attorneys for the defendant then accuse Texas, of the Two Step. Literally.


"The first step to obstruct the truth finding process during the Rule 15 interviews of the Texas law enforcement authorities by blocking inquires into their failure to investigate the possibility that the calls from the unknown caller were a hoax, as evidenced by the ease with which it was determined to be a hoax when the authorities actually bothered to try. The second step, after blocking defendant's efforts to develop this specific information, was to file the present motion seeking to deny the defendant an evidentiary hearing by decrying the lack of specific information and claiming that 'defendant has done no more than make a [sic] conclusory assertions supported only by arguments in the pleadings.' [Request for Hearing, p 2]. The State first denies the defendant the ability to further develop specific factual information, and then complains about the lack of specific factual information. Thus, the 'two step' is complete."


Quite simply, Texas stops Warren from investigating the possibility of a Hoax in the call that set off the raid, something now widely accepted to be a foregone conclusion. It is not legally established yet, and we will see evidence of that fact, pathetic evidence really, obvious evidence, more on that in a bit. Then when Warren tries to exclude the evidence on the basis of a possible Hoax call, they say he doesn't have any evidence that the call is a hoax. The Texas 2 step, otherwise known as "Catch-22."

In the footnote, we learn more. I'm going to go out on a limb, and fill in the redacted names, and highlight them in red.


"Although the State's response neglects to mention it, there is no dispute that the affidavit was a lie: There was no such (Sarah) and she was not being abused by (Dale Barlow). The only real question is whether the Texas authorities can plausibly explain why they ignored all the earmarks of this hoax. Perhaps it is obvious why the State of Texas (with the full acquiescence of the State of Arizona) refused to allow any questions of the subject (Dale Barlow). The only real question is whether the Texas authorities can plausibly explain why they ignored all the earmarks of this hoax. Perhaps it is obvious why the State of Texas (with the full acquiescence of the State of Arizona) refused to allow any questions of (Dale Barlow)."


All the names in red are redacted (removed). This is the State of Arizona protecting "Sarah Barlow" as if she is real. By sustaining the myth that the "minor Sarah" needs protection, Arizona perpetuates the myth, intentionally, that there was abuse. If any further evidence was needed of "cahoots" we have it laid out here. Why has Arizona not shown an interest in the call? What interest do they have in preserving the notion that there is a real "Sarah" and thus protecting her identity. By redacting the names, Arizona goes through a protocol designed to hide the identity of a real minor victim of sexual abuse. Yes Virginia, there is a "Sarah Barlow," and as long as there is one, then there is cause for the raid. This proves what I've been saying all along, Texas (and now Arizona) resist knowing what they could easily know, and already have the evidence for, that "Sarah" is Rozita Swinton, of Colorado Springs, Colorado. 34 years old. Black. Single. Never a mother. Never at YFZ. A frequent sexual abuse hoax caller with a record. As long as the right had does not see what is in the left, officially, they do not know. Not redacting the name proves that they already know "Sarah" is a hoax. Redacting it maintains the myth. Not even Warren's attorney's could write the script that redacting their motion, would lead to perhaps the biggest story. It's a shame too, this motion is a bombshell without it. And it's well written. These are not only great attorneys, they're great writers.

Next, they take on the obvious expertise of Ranger Brooks Long, and how he shamelessly sets that expertise to facilitate the raid.

"Sgt. Long of the Texas Rangers personally attended a press conference staged by outspoken anti-FLDS advocate Flora Jessop at which she inveighed against the FLDS and its beliefs and practices. After the press conference, Sgt. Long had a face to face interview with Flora Jessop and asked her specifically if she had any information about criminal activity by members of the FLDS. Flora Jessop assured Sgt. Long that she had such information but Sgt. Long determined that there was no substance to Flora Jessop's allegations. In his words, no 'meat and potatoes.'



She had, she said a lot of things but there were never meat and potatoes that we as investigators in the state of Texas could say there was a violation of law happening out there or that a victim existed like what she was saying."



[Long Interview, p. 40].


Obviously, if enemies of the FLDS are willing to make unsubstantiated claims of criminal activity in a face to face interview, any reasonable law enforcement official would recognize the possibility that similar accusations would come from an unknown caller who was hostile to the FLDS. The fact that the Texas law enforcement officials included the unknown caller's allegations in the search warrant as if they were true, and without even minimal investigation is reckless disregard for the truth at its finest (or worst). After personally experiencing face to face baseless accusations, the Texas law enforcement authorities did nothing to determine whether allegations from the unknown caller were also baseless allegations from an enemy of the FLDS. Thus the defendant has presented and will present (based on Rule 15 interviews) evidence showing that under the totality of the circumstances, the Texas law enforcement authorities did nothing to establish the veracity, reliability, or credibility of the information provided from the unknown caller.


This failure to grasp the basic fundamentals of police investigation is simply incomprehensible, especially in light of the actions of ll the other agencies who received similar unsubstantiated, anonymous allegations against members of the FLDS. For the same reason, this is not a matter of hindsight being "20/20." These other agencies were competent enough to determine that further investigation was necessary at the time, rather than running off to secure a search warrant making arrangements for 152 officers to conduct a raid with a SWAT team, an armored personnel carrier, an unmanned drone, and a helicopter.


Ranger long has already demonstrated caution when it came to unsubstantiated claims, yet he believes the phone call. The answer? He doesn't believe the phone call, he believes as probably Sheriff Doran does, that it's a way in. Nothing more. A pretext. An excuse. After further review, it would appear that the first part of the next paragraph does not say that Texas did know. I believe that based on reading the Exhibit, that they may very well have known. What I said before was; "Next an apparent bombshell. The reader may feel free to correct me with observations."

"Contrary to the State's claims the defendant has provided additional specific factual information about the Texas authorities' reckless disregard respecting this hoax and has shown the ease with which the hoax could have been discovered. Exhibit 3 to Defendant's Motion to Suppress is an unsealed Colorado arrest warrant and affidavit that shows Texas authorities were well aware of the fact that two telephones utilized to make the numerous calls to the 'Crisis Hotline' in San Angelo, Texas, were registered telephone numbers outside the State of Texas. Texas authorities were immediately able to determine that these telephone numbers were associated with an individual who made numerous 'false reports of sexual abuse to the police and other agencies.' [Exhibit 3, attachment A, p.5]."


Striking what I had written before, I would say there are several revelations of this motion. What is the before mentioned redaction. By removing the name "Sarah" Arizona proves it's participation in the fiction she exists. The fiction is maintained for specific legal cover. At the point of the redaction, Texas has discovered all relevant facts but refuses to investigate. The only reason they don't know is they don't want to. This brings us to the second point. That being Texas doesn't want to know, and didn't want to know then. Warren's attorneys point to Sgt. Brooks Long's talent and natural caution with regard to believing an unfounded accusation by Flora Jessop. The last is, in combination with Exhibit 3, attachment A, p.5, we know the following;


"On April 13, 2008, I was contacted by Sergeant Hugh Velasquez (1514D) regarding information he had obtained from Sergeant Sean Mandel. Sergeant Mandel told Sergeant Velasquez he had been contacted by the Texas Rangers in regard to their investigation into the Yearning for Zion (YFZ) Ranch. Sergeant Mandel related Texas Ranger Brooks Long had advised he had two cellular telephone number listings from the Colorado Springs area (719-351-0913 and 719-243-2866). Sergeant Mandel was aware that the phone number, 719-351-0913, that was possibly related to the reporting party for the YFZ Ranch incident in Eldorado, Texas, was also identified in a prior CSPD case report."


What we do not know is what we know. That is Assistant District Attorney Ann Mullaney hears third hand of the contact between Brooks Long and Sean Mandel on April 13th, 2008. Brooks calls Mandel, Mandel tells Velasquez, Velasquez tells Mullaney. When did Brooks Long call Mandel? Mandel in this analysis does not speak directly to Mullaney. Texas still could very well have known all about Rozita before the actual invasion of YFZ, and that would be a second bombshell. (hat tip to Silver Rose and kbp)

UPDATED AGAIN: Now from reading the Mohave Daily News, it would seem that Piccarreta is claiming Texas did know about Rozita Swinton.
More →

Sphere: Related Content

Friday, January 09, 2009

Bill Medvecky hits the Radar Screen

BLIP !


From Brooke Adam's blog, "The Plural Life."


"So what did we do to pass the time? The reporters chatted. Caseworkers and ad litems (there were 13 in the courtroom by my count) chatted. And read.

Copies of an article were being passed around among the state workers, and I got a glance at the headline: 'CPS dykes want to groom [girl’s name omitted].' Yikes, I thought, not exactly material you want CPS caseworkers reading dur(i)ng a hearing on whether you are capable of caring for your daughter."


Thanks to Bill, we know for certain now that CPS in Texas reads the blogs. Thanks guys and gals. Hope you love it. I'm assuming of course they cruise mine from time to time. Sorry 'bout your Cowboys. Maybe next year.

At any rate, as I tried to explain to an alleged attorney poster at Brooke's blog, Rule one, DO NOT DIGNIFY THE MINOR OPPOSITION BY RESPONDING TO THEM (or naming them). Rule two? Refer to rule one. Next thing you know Bill will be getting tickets to Oprah to be her guest. When all you really have is a "convict them in the press" strategy, it's not a good idea to create news for the other side. Yet that is what they have done.

Since I now must assume that DFPS in Texas reads the "Pro FLDS" or "FLDS Centric" or "FLDS Friendly blogs," I'd like to provide them with a handy little tool.

Whenever you're wondering, just click.

As of today (it may change tomorrow) the number one PRO FLDS or ANTI site is:

Truth Will Prevail.

The rest in order are:

The Modern Pharisee! (Me Me Me Me Me Me!)

Free the FLDS Children (Bill)

The Common Room

Contraries

Sore Toes and a Bleeding Heart

Child Brides (Flora's site?)

Texas Polygamy

All of these are ranked by "Alexa Rankings" in the United States. The overall number at the bottom of the page, not the top. If your blog or site didn't have such a number, it didn't make the list. Comment if you think I missed one, and I'll insert it in the appropriate place right away. For a limited time. I assume that rankings will change over the next few days or weeks, Bill might outshine Google if he doesn't watch it.

I left out blogs like "Grits for Breakfast" which is a high ranking and great blog, but Scott doesn't blog consistantly on the FLDS so his fame is largely due to other pursuits. I can't break out Brooke's blog from Salt Lake Tribune statistics, but I would assume that if I could, it would outrank us all. Maybe all of us combined. Since I believe the facts are on the FLDS side, Brooke, though nominally neutral, would appear to be "Pro" FLDS most of the time.

What's notable is that they are almost all PRO or FLDS leaning blogs. 7 months ago, "Texas Polygamy," a nominally neutral (but really anti) spot was on top. Child Brides has never drawn very much traffic, and I now rate just below what must pass for the official FLDS mouthpiece, "Truth Will Prevail."

This shows you what people believe, where the news is, whose anaylsis they trust and where sympathies lie. Beyond inflaming the ill informed, the Anti FLDS side hasn't got much. As soon as the truth breaks through, and dawns on most of the nation, if it ever does, Texas is toast, and they've started giving us publicity. Hopefully, they'll try to investigate or arrest someone.
More →

Sphere: Related Content

Thursday, January 01, 2009

It is important, to remember how the raid started. It is damning.

From The Truth Will Prevail, the account of what happened at YFZ.

"A little before 6:00 p.m. on April 3, an APC (armored personnel carrier), two police cars, a cargo-carrier van, and a black Ford Expedition moved into position on the Griffin property north of the YFZ Ranch. Soon a SWAT team was hunkered down behind the APC in full gear, including body armor, helmets, face masks, machine guns, and other weapons.

At about the same time close to thirty police cars and unmarked vehicles arrived at the main gate to the Ranch."


Law enforcement is prepared for an armed confrontation. At the very least, they are prepared to veto any attempt to resist or escape, they have come prepared for battle, and have surrounded YFZ. If they really think "Sarah" is still there, a suggestion that they have been staking out the FLDS for a few days prior in some way shape or form, has credibility. They would have to watch them to know that their "evidence" is still at the ranch.

"The men (of YFZ) told the officers (at the gate) that there was no Sarah Jessop Barlow in the community and asked whether the call had been traced to be sure that it was coming from the Ranch."


FLDS men are clearly dubious. They demand to know if there is probable cause. Did the call come from the community? Yes, you can trace the number they assert. This is true. Yes you can identify what cell tower was involved with the call from that number. Clearly this could be done, clearly with the FLDS surrounded there is no danger of escape. The FLDS ask pointedly if "due diligence" has been done.

"When the sheriff replied that the number was blocked so that the call couldn’t be traced, the men said they understood there was technology available to get past a blocked number and that the whole thing sounded like a prank call, probably a Flora Mae Jessop deal. Doran dodged the issue and claimed that he had seen the locations described in the calls and that the caller would have to be inside the ranch to have included so many details."


Sheriff Doran later claims to have an informant on the Ranch, he claims to know the call must have come from inside, because of detail. This is all very disturbing because if no one can know this sort of detail, except for Doran, and for the FLDS themselves, then how does "Sarah" know details that make her story convincing? Sheriff Doran is now squarely on the hot spot for having spilled details himself, or lying about how authentic they are. He still has a chance to "holster" his weapon, and back down. But he doesn't.

"There is ample evidence, however, that the Texas authorities knew, or should have known, that the calls on which their search warrant was based were bogus. Between March 29 and April 5, sixteen calls were placed to the Newbridge Family Shelter in San Angelo, Texas, from the alleged 'Sarah.' Such calls were still going on while the raid was in progress. The same phone number was used to call a battered women’s shelter in Washington State numerous times between March 22 and April 8 with a similar story. There is no evidence, however, that a small army was assembled for an investigation anywhere but in Texas."


This is also a critical point. "Sarah" is calling all over the place. Arizona disregarded a similar call, Utah disregarded a similar call, "Sarah" continues to call Texas. Only in Texas is a small army assembled to respond to a call that now has real reason to be suspected as bogus. They have the technology to investigate the calls origins, and to see where they are coming from, but they aren't interested. They're only interested in one thing, getting in. And they're in a hurry. Is it because over time, it will be discovered that the cause does not exist, and the warrant is questionable? If so, these are men trying to create a massive distraction to cover up for the fact they have overstepped.

"It is a well-known fact that these calls have since been linked to a 33-year-old African American woman in Colorado Springs named Rozita Swinton, who has a history of making false reports of sexual abuse."


It is well known to Texas, and well known to those that do know, that they won't admit it. Most people in the United States are not familiar with her and at best, still only regard her as a suspect in a possibly fraudulent call, if they know that much. What the public "knows" is more along the lines of what an Obama voter knew about who controlled congress. In fact, I'd have to say an Obama voter was better informed. Texas is banking on this and continues to bank on this ignorance.

"The brother of Dale Evans Barlow, alleged husband of 'Sarah,' arrived at the gate of the ranch about 7:15 p.m. and told the officers that no one in his brother’s family was named Sarah Jessop. He said that Dale did not live on the ranch and had never been there. By this time the officers had obtained Dale’s cell-phone number, and Sheriff Doran and Captain Caver of the Rangers went to the sheriff’s vehicle and talked to Dale, who lives in Colorado City, Arizona, and had not even been in Texas since a school trip in 1977. Dale gave the officers his driver’s license number to verify his identity."


Normally, this would give a neutral person cause to pause. There is no neutrality. You don't call in an army to ask questions. All they want is to get inside. Any excuse will do, and it is becoming rapidly evident that there isn't even an excuse. For the raid that they are determined to justify, Texas now knows they will have to get inside. Normally, when confronted with confident people, resisiting you who present facts that constantly are born out by investigation, you slow down. Texas cannot slow down, it would be too embarrassing, and they'll probably never get in again, as evidenced by the subsequent attempt to return to the ranch in May. They KNOW this. They MUST get in, or they will NEVER get in.

This is persuasive proof that they were there for the abuses they suspected were going on at the ranch, but had no evidence for. It's no longer important if "Sarah" exists, I would have to say at this point even if there was no conspiracy to manufacture evidence, that Sheriff Doran is feeling the hot prickly adrenalin warning that he's wrong. He now has two choices. Back off and be embarrassed to the point of maybe losing his job, or charge in and "find something." Anything.

"Dale Barlow’s April telephone record from South Central Communications shows two calls from the same number in Texas at 6:20:42 p.m. and 6:24:59 p.m. MST on April 3. There are no other calls on the record from or to Texas. After the conversation the officers remarked as they returned to the gate, 'Well, that takes care of half the problem. Now we need to find this Sarah Jessop Barlow.' "


The "Perp" is not there. Texas believes he is not there. They have every reason to believe he has never been there. This speech pattern is the speech pattern of someone determined to do a thing, not of someone who is listening. They are literally saying they choose to beleive the other two thirds of the story now told by a liar. Why? Because they want in.

I have been fired in my lifetime. I have sat before men who accused me of things that I summarily proved did not occur. Nothing changed, they were there to fire me, the reasons they gave were merely the excuse, window dressing. I have also confronted CPS myself, at the gate, figuratively speaking. I know that aggressive and confidently assured presentation causes investigators to think. The CPS did not come to my house because I presented them with all the evidence. They blustered, told me they could come anyway and I couldn't do anything about it. I told them they could, but it would be over my dead body because nothing that they had proposed had happened, and I wouldn't let them in my home. They investigated and called me back and angrily derided me for my confrontational attitude, but they never came. Texas did not stop because they were convinced that once inside, they could justify their raid. They also had the firepower to enforce their behavior. In my case had someone shown up, it wouldn't have been with a swat team, and that, made them cautious.

It is, as is said in this article and elsewhere, a fishing expedition. They were also sure they wouldn't get hurt. They were sure, though without evidence, that they would find something. With 430 children, yes, they would if they searched everywhere and everyone. More →

Sphere: Related Content

Saturday, December 27, 2008

The FLDS Strike Back

From, "The Truth Will Prevail"

When Texas law-enforcement officials and CPS invaded the YFZ Ranch on April 3, 2008, their actions were totally unjustified. They had no credible evidence of abuse, only a hoax telephone call from a woman currently undergoing psychiatric treatment. They never entered the Ranch to find the supposed “victim” but rather to go on a fishing expedition for evidence of abuse, neglect, or supposed criminal activity. For Texas CPS and law-enforcement officials to continue to make disturbing and unfounded allegations of abuse and neglect is nothing more than an attempt to justify their own barbaric actions and to divert attention from the real issues, such as the irreparable damage inflicted on innocent children and the expenditure of millions of taxpayer dollars on this unjustifiable raid. The Eldorado Investigation Report released by CPS on December 22, is as false and fraudulent as the original hoax telephone call that triggered the raid.
The Texas Court of Appeals ordered the return of the children, and the Texas Supreme Court sustained this decision by ruling, “On the record before us, removal of the children was not warranted.”
Texas CPS has never given reliable information. Shortly after the raid, they leaked news reports of an excessive number of broken bones among YFZ children. This figure was later shown to be considerably lower than the national average. They classified 26 adult women as underage mothers when their true age was backed up by government-issued ID’s and then kept two of these women in state custody long enough to kidnap their newborn babies.
At the 14-day hearing, they claimed that 5 minor girls were pregnant or had given birth. On April 28, CPS spokesman Darrell Azar increased the count to 31. The Eldorado Investigation report of December 22 now places the number at 7. When has CPS ever told the truth? They have never acknowledged their former inaccurate statements. They have no credibility.
The new CPS report has manufactured 262 cases of child abuse where none existed by claiming that parents who did not remove their children from a home where they were exposed to the example of an alleged underage marriage were guilty of neglect. What hypocrisy in a state that leads the nation in teen pregnancies! The report then proceeds to imply that their so-called “neglect” is also abuse by the cleverly worded statement, “Of the 146 families investigated, 62 percent had a confirmed finding of abuse or neglect involving one or more children in the family.” Later in the report CPS admits that 96 percent of the YFZ children have now been “determined to be safe in their households to the point that there is not a need for court oversight.” There never was a need for court oversight in the first place! Instructors of the state-required parenting classes noted on many occasions that the FLDS parents should have been teaching the classes.
Now that most of the children have been nonsuited, it might be assumed that the families have returned to the security of their homes and community. But what are they to return to? Their temple has been desecrated. Irreplaceable documents and artifacts of earlier Church prophets have been confiscated, when they contained nothing even implying criminal conduct. Their homes have been broken into, and even unlocked doors have been kicked in. They lost an entire growing season for their gardens and orchards, a very critical situation for a people who, contrary to the common misperception, had not a single person on Welfare. Their priceless baby pictures, wedding pictures, genealogy books, diaries, and other personal records have been seized with no prospect of their ever being returned.
A formerly self-sustaining community has been reduced to poverty. They now must pay $544,100.77 in property taxes, but their resources have been wasted and their source of livelihood cut off. Texas brags that it has spent over 12.4 million dollars to date on the YFZ raid, including more than a million dollars for bussing the children from their homes to shelters and foster-care facilities, and yet not one penny has ever been given to parents to reimburse them for the millions of dollars they have expended to pay the staggering legal expenses, to visit children scattered all across the state of Texas, or to rent houses and live in cities away from the Ranch.
Constitutional rights were trampled upon as though they didn’t apply to the FLDS. Instead of being presented with search warrants, the people were presented with deadly weapons. When one young mother answered the door, she faced two loaded guns only 12 inches from her head. Her four-year-old son, his face white with terror, asked, “Mother, are they coming to shoot us?” The Court of Appeals ruled that officials were not justified in treating the entire ranch community as one household, supposedly covered by a single search warrant, and even the general warrant for the expanded search was not signed until after the searches and seizures already had taken place.
When the FLDS men surrounding the Temple failed to be intimidated by tanks, helicopters, and armed men, and with no resistance knelt in prayer, an officer fired several rounds from his gun in an apparent attempt to provoke a confrontation. With snipers positioned on the limestone rocks above the sacred site, this action easily could have triggered a bloody assassination.
The only real abuse that either women or children suffered was at the hands of Texas law enforcement and CPS. They were treated as prisoners of war at the San Angelo Coliseum and the other shelters. Children, and even pregnant mothers, shivered on hard army cots with only a plastic pillow and two thin blankets that were more like sheets, while a large overhead door was left open most of the night. Children used to unprocessed foods and natural sweeteners were fed a diet loaded with canned foods, preservatives, and sugar. Many suffered from stomach cramps and diarrhea. Through a combination of unfamiliar diet, exposure, and stress, almost every child became sick, and some coughed so hard that they vomited. In an effort to make the public aware of the dreadful conditions in the shelters, several mothers talked to reporters from the Deseret News and shared pictures taken with their cell phones. Just 20 minutes after a special media presentation aired on April 13, featuring conversations with three mothers, an order was given to confiscate the cell phones, isolating the captives from their attorneys and from any outside communication. A member of another government agency reported that after screaming children were ripped from their mothers in the Coliseum, one baby was left in a stroller for 24 hours without food or water and had to be hospitalized. Firsthand witnesses testify that many babies were drugged to sedate them after the separation, and one 18-month-old boy went into shock as a result.
Innocent girls were brutally interrogated for hours as investigators demanded, “How many husbands do you have?” or “How many men have you spiritually been with?” When they answered quite honestly “None” or that they didn’t know what they were talking about, they were shouted at and told, “You are a liar, and you know where liars go.” Investigators insisted that they did have babies but just wouldn’t admit it. At Fort Concho, a young lady was locked in a room for hours and told that she never would see her family and friends again unless she admitted to things that she knew nothing of. This is the treatment CPS meted out to the alleged “victims,” and yet they still dare to assert that the secure and loving homes to which the children were returned were abusive.
These people are not just “those FLDS.” They are American citizens, and they have been treated in a most unconstitutional and un-American way.
CPS has been a convenient tool for government officials seeking to implement their own vindictive agenda of driving the FLDS out of the state by holding as hostages the most prized possession of any family, their children. Texas state representative Harvey Hilderbran introduced House Bill 3006 in 2005 specifically targeting the FLDS. The House Research Organization bill analysis quotes supporters as saying: “A group of Fundamentalist Church of Latter-Day Saints is building a compound south of San Angelo… Local residents… are concerned that members of the group will run for public office and will have moved a large enough group of voters into the area to take over local government.”
On June 2, 2008, the Deseret News quotes Hilderbran’s gloating comment on his efforts to drive the FLDS: “I wanted to make it unappealing to them. I hoped they wouldn’t stay.” Eldorado sheriff David Doran is quoted in the Fort Worth Star Telegram of June 3, 2008, as saying, “I believe when all of the criminal charges come forward it is going to be very hard to practice their beliefs within the state of Texas.” Even Texas governor Rick Perry, while addressing a business conference in LaBaule, France, on June 5, 2008, said in reference to the FLDS, “Maybe Texas is not the place you need to consider calling home.” Governor Perry went on to accept full responsibility for the raid. And CPS has the audacity to say that “it has never been about religion.”
Shortly after the raid, when things looked darkest, the FLDS people sent personal appeals to Governor Perry, state and national legislators, and even the President of the United States. Their desperate pleas for help were not even acknowledged.
Government officials misuse their power when they ignore the truth and believe only that which will further their own agendas. This nation has fought a divisive war on the basis of bad intelligence, and CPS has continued on a course of bad intelligence from the day they entered the YFZ Ranch. They have never proven ANY allegations, and we strongly urge the people of Texas, and of this nation as a whole, to hold these officials accountable for their gross misrepresentations and abuse.
In behalf of the many FLDS families traumatized by the YFZ Ranch raid, we first thank our Heavenly Father for His protecting hand. We are sincerely grateful to the Texas Court of Appeals, the Texas Supreme Court, and the dedicated lawyers who have worked tirelessly and without pay in the reunification of the FLDS children and their parents. We also thank the many friends who came to our aid from across the nation and around the world. Your expressions of kindness, your prayers, and your support mean more than you will ever know.
Sincerely,
Willie Jessop
Mothers and Children of YFZ
More →

Sphere: Related Content

Tuesday, December 23, 2008

UPDATED: CPS runs back to inflating numbers about FLDS "Abuse."

UPDATED: It is my belief, based on discussion with Patrick Crimmins, that this report was essentially ready, over a month ago. It's release was delayed to have the most minimal negative impact (to CPS) possible. No questions are possible, dump the report and run. (Further updates below)

Employing a tactic we are oh so familiar with, Texas goes back to inflating the numbers and releasing their smears before a long weekend. This hits the news today, designed to dominate the news cycle about the FLDS over the Christmas weekend. It's a drive by.

SAN ANTONIO (AP/KSL News) - "Texas child welfare authorities conclude in a new report that nearly two-thirds of the families living at a polygamist group's ranch had children who were abused or neglected."

Of course we need to define how, about which apparently Texas is more specific than it used to be.

"The Department of Family and Protective Services released the report to The Associated Press on Tuesday, saying 12 girls, ages 12 to 15, are believed to have been abused. Another 274 children were listed as neglected because the agency says the parents knew there was abuse in the household but did not move their children away."

This is the oh so familiar tactic employed earlier this year where there were "41 of the 463 children" with broken bones. This later turned out to be a below normal bone breakage rate. Darrell Azar told Fox News;

"53 girls between the ages of 14 and 17 were living on the ranch in Eldorado. Of that group, 31 already have children or are pregnant."

UPDATED:

The Dallas Morning News - "Mr. Crimmins acknowledged Tuesday, 'We were not able to link any of the broken bones to physical abuse.' "

Now there are 12 girls "believed to have been abused" yet only one man has been charged with impregnating an underage girl seen at YFZ that day. There are only 12 men indicted, and not all for polygyny or bigamy or child abuse. Furthermore, Texas could not even keep an accurate count of the children, lost track of two at one point and nearly killed another through neglect and dehydration. We're to rely on the numbers from these liars and incompetents?

Furthermore, what qualifies as abuse? They say "two thirds of the families" had abused kids most of whom were abused by contact with abusive examples. Contrast that with their own belief that 62% of girls are abused in the population as a whole by age of 18. 31% of the boys, they believe have been abused (Hat Tip Joseph Farah WND). They find only 12 girls? This represents less than 10% of the girls if in fact they can be believed on that number. This is an abuse rate fantastically lower than the population at large. With what we know now, that there were about 430 kids at YFZ, figuring half to be girls that's actually about a 5% rate of "girl abuse." So what do they do? They conflate the number with bystanders to create a 2/3rds abuse rate, to show that the abuse rate was large. Statistically, if you overlap the abuse rate randomly of 215 girls, with about 107 or so boys, there would be a much larger rate of abuse. About a third of the "abused boys" would statistically be distributed among families with no sexually abused girls, so it would be about an abuse rate of 72-73% overall. That means even a 2/3rd's abuse rate is lower than the population at large, even accepting their bystander theory of abuse by osmosis. Apparently, CPS sees abuse everywhere and maybe it is. When they pawed through every sock drawer though of the FLDS, they could only find 12 girls. This is not an indictment of the FLDS and it's practices and gives rise to asking a question. Reporting on the same news release;

The Houston Chronicle - "The Yearning for Zion case is about sexual abuse of girls and children who were taught that underage marriages are a way of life," officials state in the final investigative report on the April raid. "It is about parents who condoned illegal underage marriages and adults who failed to protect young girls — it has never been about religion."

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services "Officials" claim it was not about religion. After Harvey Hilderbran introduced and got passed a law specifically to "get" the FLDS and crowed about it, and after raiding a private group that has a much lower incidence of child abuse than the population at large, that wasn't contributing to welfare roles, what else is there?

More →

Sphere: Related Content

Friday, October 17, 2008

There Is No Investigation You Morons

The untouchable Rozita Swinton continues to be mentally evaluated and treated. The LIES of Texas become increasingly obvious.

The Deseret News - "Six months after the raid, the Texas Attorney General's Office is declining to comment much on the status of its ongoing investigation.

'No state charges are pending re: Swinton,' spokesman Jerry Strickland said in an e-mail to the Deseret News. 'We cannot and will not comment on details of our investigation.' "


There is no investigation. Selective justice continues. Remember, as long as Texas is "investigating" and as long as they find nothing because they aren't really investigating, Texas can pretend that they had cause going into YFZ.

This is PUTRID. Texas has known for half a year now who called with the bogus tip regarding YFZ. They've put all the evidence they have in a safe place and not looked at it, that's because they can't officially KNOW that it was Rozita. Furthermore, after this length of time, one begins to wonder if they evidence they collected when they first discovered Rozita is damning. Of THEM.

This is CORRUPT.

This is WRONG. More →

Sphere: Related Content

Thursday, October 09, 2008

Texas Continues to Pretend

Yawn, the Castle Rock case is dependent entirely on the El Paso County Colorado case. Buried in the latest Rozita Swinton "news" are these little tidbits;

The Deseret News - "Sarah has never been found. Barlow was never arrested. The Texas Attorney General's Office told the Deseret News the case remains under investigation."


Unless something happens in Texas (or maybe Arizona) summoning Rozita to the stand, any news about her is likely to be of no value until perhaps next year. The significant portion of the story is above. Texas perpetrates the offical lie that they are still investigating the case because it preserves the illusion, officially, that they had cause going into YFZ. How cynical and how unjust.

Random Thought: Is Dale Barlow the secret sealed indictment ninth man? Another thought: Supposedly there were 18 sealed indictments handed down almost immediately, the first day the Grand Jury met. I still don't get that. More →

Sphere: Related Content

Friday, July 18, 2008

The Latest Texas Lie.

To be fair, they might finally get one right, but their track record doesn't give me much hope. The Houston Chronicle (hat tip "I Perceive")

"'Based on the information in the attachments, CASA feels that (the girl) would be at risk for continued sexual abuse,' the CASA report states."


This disgusting quote is based on fallacy of complex question. A question exemplified by the classic "When did you stop beating your wife?" The most truthful answer, if you never have beaten your wife, is: "I haven't."

"Continued Sexual Abuse?" There is no documentation whatsoever that there has ever been SEXUAL CONTACT with Teresa Jeffs by ANYONE. More →

Sphere: Related Content

Sunday, July 06, 2008

Another Three Month Anniversary

Within two weeks of raiding the FLDS ranch in Eldorado, Texas was also conducting another raid, one that they hoped would go more quietly. They've had almost 90 days to evaluate the evidence taken in that raid as well. They were in Rozita Swinton's apartment. They took a statement, they collected evidence, and they pretended not to know anything.

CNN - April 23rd, 2008 - "Although Texas officials said they have not found the woman who made the calls, they said they have found evidence that girls as young at 13 are forced into marriages with older men at the ranch."


We now know the opposite is true. Texas did in fact find the woman that made the calls, that's why they were there. They have not found any 13 or 14 or 15 or 16 year old girls forced into marriages with older men at the ranch.

In fact Texas is truth challenged when it comes to the YFZ raid, having spread numerous false stories about the FLDS that have one by one, been proven to be untrue. So when they open their mouths to say SOMETHING, we no longer believe it. What we should be looking at now, is what they will say NOTHING about.

Distraction is an art used in politics and lying and in magic acts. The whole point of distraction is to do something right under your nose that you will not notice because, you're distracted. Bump a mark, lift their wallet. Point to the American Eagle, and palm a coin which you later "take" from someone's ear. Texas has been as leaky as the Titanic when it comes to rumors about the FLDS, so what have they been doing with that valuable distraction?

Human nature should tell us that the thing Texas does NOT talk about is the thing they wish to conceal. That would be Roztia Swinton. Just as they have had a lot to say about crimes that did not occur with evidence they have collected from every nook and cranny of the YFZ ranch, they have had nothing to say about evidence they've had almost equally as long regarding Rozita.

By now, don't you think they would have said SOMETHING about her publically? Never mind the fact that it's probably ill advised to do so, if there was no pattern of deception in the YFZ story, just a bunch of over enthusiastic CPS workers and Texas Rangers thinking they'd found the Holy Grail of abuse, wouldn't there have been leakage from them about Rozita?

There has in fact been complete SILENCE. This proves Texas can keep a secret when it wants to so since we have no statements, we have by their behavior, proof of a secret. We also have proof they want it to be secret. To review. Texas has engaged in a rumor mongering free for all when it comes to allegations about the FLDS at YFZ. They have been more silent than Garbo when it comes to Rozita.

For us the questions center around what Rozita's involvement was with FLDS haters like Flora Jessop. What were Flora's connections with Texas and so on. How much commerce was there between all those parties (and others) leading up to the raid. If there had been any investigation of Rozita and her possible connections, we'd have heard about it now.

I suggest that when you combine our interest, as the public, with the total silence of Texas, there is proof that at least Texas is afraid. They are afraid if they turn over a certain rock or two, they know what they will find. That, or they already know because they've already looked. More →

Sphere: Related Content

Wednesday, June 25, 2008

I Perceive indeed.

Kurt is an attorney, and attorneys talk to him. As a consequence he is doing some of the first real investigative journalism on the story. I speculate, I dig up a few lousy crumbs, Kurt scoops. (By the way, I think my speculation is pretty dang GOOD speculation, but it's not the good stuff, yet.)

Have your remaining reservations laid aside about the FLDS. Read it all. More →

Sphere: Related Content

Teresa Jeffs wins something after all. Alan Futrell is her REAL attorney.

Two things seem to have come out of the Grand Jury. One is that I may have been to hasty to say that Malonis and Walther won. They engaged in the face saving move of declaring that Malonis was still Teresa Jeffs attorney, but Malonis clearly was not. Another is that they have not been quick to issue indictments, though I am certain some will come. As loose as Grand Jury proceedings are that's almost a certainty. The Grand Jury knows the prosecution wants indictments, and is inclined to give them out. It is significant that the next meeting will be July 22nd. We may get to hear from Rozita Swinton at least before the next Grand Jury meeting unless there is another convienient "delay." I doubt that Allen Steed will have his next court date before then, as his next date is more variable.

The San Angelo Standard-Times - ELDORADO - "With today's meeting of the Schleicher County grand jury nearing an end, no indictments have yet been issued and the panel has agreed to meet again July 22, one attorney said.

Alan Fatrell (sic?), the criminal defense attorney for the 16-year-old daughter of Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints leader Warren Jeffs, told reporters this afternoon that the grand jury would call one more witness before recessing until July 22. However, he said he did not know whether the continuation means the panel will not issue any indictments until that date."

Alan is apparently for all intents and purposes Teresa's attorney. It may be that officially Natalie Malonis is, but it's apparently not working that way.

"Malonis and the girl spent practically no time together, the attorney usually staying inside the courthouse or on the steps, with her client several yards away with other sect members and their attorneys."

So not really her attorney after all.


The Deseret News has this interesting quote;

"San Angelo attorney Brad Haralson represents several mothers.

'I can't say a thing,' he told reporters as he walked to his car. 'I don't know if there's really a schedule. They're just doing it. No agenda was sent out to anybody.'"

This suggests the Grand Jury proceedings are a show on a schedule, not a proceeding with a legal goal of finding the truth. "We're just going to do this" would seem to be the operative phrase, the same sort of train wreck justice that applied to the custody hearings, and "service plans" also presided over by Walthers. I can't hold it back any longer, Barbara Walthers is a political hack. She may be good at manuevering people that way, but she's not a legal mind or a good judge. She's a politician.

More →

Sphere: Related Content

Matching Time Frames. The FLDS Fiasco to be over before school starts.

Friday I said it would be 60 days and Texas would make their move to get the kids back. Probably not all of them, but certainly some of them. With Willie Jessop being "restrained" from being near Teresa Jeffs, and her apparent "star witness" status at the Grand Jury, I continue to believe that is true. Wherever Teresa is, Willie cannot be for 90 days. I figure the Judge gave herself a little leeway as to time, perhaps things will take longer than July and August. Who knows? They may concoct a reason to get him into jail by then. The Deseret News;

SAN ANGELO, Texas — "A temporary restraining order, banning Fundamentalist LDS Church member and spokesman Willie Jessop from having contact, intimidating or coming within 500 feet of 16-year-old Teresa Jeffs, has been extended for 90 days."


There's really no reason for this except to isolate and intimidate witnesses and create the impression in the mind of the general public that Willie did something wrong. He hasn't.

"Salt Lake attorney Jim Bradshaw, who represented FLDS member Allen Steed in his Utah rape trial, was in Texas Tuesday and told reporters after the hearing that the ruling is not an indication that Jessop did anything wrong.

'I want to make it very clear Willie Jessop has done nothing wrong,' he said. 'He has no concern or desire to direct Teresa to what she does or doesn't do. All Willie wants to do is get a lawyer to represent her interests.'"


More →

Sphere: Related Content

Friday, June 20, 2008

Grand Jury to get in gear by Wednesday

It may be that no minors testify, only those women who WERE minors at the time of conception.

"A Schleicher County clerk confirmed the grand jury has been called in but would not say why or when it would meet. But The Salt Lake Tribune has learned the hearing will be under way by Wednesday and is related to the investigation of residents of the Yearning for Zion Ranch, all members of the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. The grand jury met June 2 but didn't take up any FLDS-related matters."


The formation of a Grand Jury shows how WEAK the evidence Texas has, is. More →

Sphere: Related Content

Thursday, June 19, 2008

6 Months Pregnant


So far I have not heard anything about the birth of a child to the last remaining supposedly pregnant FLDS supposedly underage girl. What comes out of the Texas CPS in terms of information is grossly flawed most of the time, and that is putting it politely.

At the point this picture of popular actress Halle Berry is taken she is 6 months pregnant
. Is she just eating too much or does she have a bump? We all knew at this point that she was pregnant.

If you look at Ms. Berry's breast, it seems larger than her child. Halle is wearing clothing considered not so chaste by the FLDS.

By contrast, here are 6 girls and or young women of the FLDS.

Is the girl on the far left pregnant? Is the girl second from the right pregnant? I mention this because we are rapidly approaching the day that the raid is 6 months old. We still have confusing reports of how many girls were seen pregnant. I have published what I believe to be evidence that the one girl that is now supposedly still pregnant, was not far enough along to show, and in fact this is the only girl that CPS can now point to as BEING pregnant at the time of the raid.

Enough is enough. The second warrant is invalid. It is based on "Seeing" pregnant underage girls at YFZ and we now know there is only one possible girl for this description. Reports in the press say this one girl (it HAS to be her) was so indefinitely pregnant that she had to be asked to take a pregnancy test, which she refused.

How then does Texas have ANY cause for ANY of the actions it now continues to pursue? Do we wait until the end of of July and ask what a 5 month pregnant woman or girls looks like in a "Prairie Dress?" The truth is Texas didn't SEE ANYTHING. They're not erring on the side of caution unless that caution is for their own hides. They've just busted down the door of the YFZ, they've just finished defiling their "Temple" and they've got nothing so they came up with this laughable concept that they could "See" pregnant underage girls and could also "See" the fact that they had become pregnant IN Texas (we already know there were visitors there from Arizona and Canada that day) and had done so with an "illegal" partner.

Had the girl been from Utah, she could have been as young as 14, and 8 months pregnant and her child's father an ADULT and no crime would have been committed.

So I'm laying on the horn a bit about this but it's the only remaining shred of a premise that Texas clings to for claiming they have cause to continue to investigate. The press continues NOT to ask these questions loudly. They should be. They aren't. Yet here we are approaching the 3 month anniversary of the raid, and ONE of the girls in the FLDS picture above, could in fact be more pregnant than the picture of Halle Berry at her 6 month mark. They could be not pregnant at all.

Should I remind you all of the commercial based on that awkward moment "I'm not pregnant?" Does Texas now say "Thank you?" More →

Sphere: Related Content

Kurt Shultzke gets his say in the San Angelo Standard Times.

"I Perceive's" Kurt S. Schultzke Esq. gets his day to hold court in San Angelo. Here's a sample of his column in the San Angelo Standard-Times;

"The venomous vacuity of Holland's article is astonishing. She reprises so much empty propaganda with such faux indignation - 'brainwashing, conspiracy, child abuse, statutory rape, fraud and adultery' - it's hard to know where to begin a response."


More;

"Yet, CPS investigator Angie Voss and Schleicher County Sheriff David Doran have both been quoted - even after the Supreme Court condemned their actions - as saying they still believe they did the right thing in removing the children. In fact, they violated the laws of Texas while trampling underfoot highly valued relationships between parents and children. (No, I am not referring to alleged spiritual marriages.) This was a breakdown in the rule of law. Due process - that which most differentiates the United States from Mexico, Cuba, China and Russia - will be a casualty if Texans fail to demand accountability from those involved in this atrocity."


Read it ALL. More →

Sphere: Related Content

Wednesday, June 18, 2008

Where did those dossiers come from?

The Utah AG's Mouthpiece says "not from us!" The Salt Lake Tribune;

"Paul Murphy, Shurtleff's spokesman, said his office had nothing to do with profiles."


You know, that wouldn't exactly surprise me. Texas has been making stuff up all along. More →

Sphere: Related Content

Friday, May 23, 2008

Even though it CAN'T be true, the lie of "Pregnant Underage FLDS Girls" is repeated.

First of all, let me emphasize this. The lies are printed, reprinted, and even believed by the people who have had them disproved to their faces. This is in a story slated for publication, TOMORROW.

The Austin American-Statesman - "'We gained access to the ranch when the (Child Protective Services investigators) went in, but our search warrant was separate from the one CPS got," (Tela) Mange said. 'Once we got on the ranch and saw the pregnant females under the age of 17 we got our own search warrant that covers all the evidence we have.'"


I'm sorry, but we remember. There were THREE girls that state said "were pregnant" and only two that they "observed" when they went into the ranch. Both of the girls that were observably pregnant gave birth and have been declared adults. The last of the three they said at the time was pregnant, had to be tested to determine she was pregnant. Unless Texas comes forth and explains this discrepancy there were no girls they saw that were pregnant. Underage or otherwise, yet Tela Mange plunges ahead, repeats the lie as justification and the dutiful reporter prints it without questioning the facts.

More recently the description of the girls has shifted to 5 that are pregnant now or have been and I will cite Brooke Adams once more;

"Now we know the truth: There are only five girls in that group. All but one are or will be 18 this year. One gave birth when she was 17, three when they were 16. One is pregnant."


Again, this proves they did NOT see "pregnant girls." The one that is pregnant is the one that refused the pregnancy test. She has to be. That or Texas has to clear up their story. As far as we know, she is 17 now yet Tela Mange says for a story slated for publication tomorrow, that they observed "the pregnant females under the age of 17" and on that they base their warrant. No. You did not see that. If the first story I cite is wrong, then they observed at max, ONE GIRL that was pregnant. We don't even know what her age is. Historically when the state of Texas DOES NOT tell us something, it is because it works against them. If this in fact is the basis of the warrant, WHY DOES THE CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION CONTINUE?

We are approaching 2 months since the raid. This one remaining pregnant girl has not given birth. That means she could have been no more than 7 months along at the time of the raid. As each month goes by the likely hood that she "showed" gets less. If she was, as I insist based on the unrefuted first story, the remaining one is the girl that refused the pregnancy test and she clearly wasn't showing enough. You don't give pregnancy tests to 7 month pregnant girls.

This sort of IRRESPONSIBLE SLOPPINESS has to STOP. We have reporters dutifully taking dictation from police officers who clearly carry around IV BAGS of Kool Aid to get them through the day.
More →

Sphere: Related Content

Wednesday, May 21, 2008

FLDS Goes on offense over 14 year old.

From the Deseret News. It would appear FLDS attorneys are trying to use the hearings, rightfully so, to correct some errors in the record. This might also suggest that the 14 year old number given to us in the range of 14-17 is populated by only one person and this 14 year old (or others) was/were placed on the list merely to create that salacious date range.

SAN ANGELO, Texas — A lawyer for a 14-year-old girl that is on a list of so-called "disputed minors" said this morning she is not pregnant as Texas child welfare authorities have alleged.

"'My client does not have children. (She) is not pregnant. She's the youngest on the list of disputed minors,' said Andrea Sloan.

The judge hearing the case objected, saying that was not what the hearing was about. But Sloan pressed forward.

'The department is communicating to the public that there are 14-year olds who are pregnant,' she said.

Texas Child Protective Services caseworker Ashley Kennedy said that investigations were still ongoing.

The bombshell was dropped during the hearing involving Adeline Barlow, 38, the mother of a 10-year-old and the 14-year-old."

What this could mean is the FLDS is now attacking the 14 to 17 year old statement by pulling the rug out from under it. If they chip about 10 to 12 off the top, and then find the one or two 14 year olds in the "range and there are no, for instance, 15 and 16 year olds, the house of cards is now one card thick.

More →

Sphere: Related Content