- Alaska: 18, 16 with parental consent.
- Arizona: no statutory minimum, those under 18 must have parental consent, those under 16 must receive approval of a superior court judge and parental consent. (statute)
- Georgia: 18 generally, 15 with parental consent, 16 without parental consent if pregnant.
- Hawaii: 18, 15 with parental consent.
- Mississippi: 21, 17 for males, 15 for females, with parental consent.
- New Hampshire: 18 generally; 14 for males and 13 for females, in cases of "special cause" with parental consent and court permission.
- North Carolina: 18 generally, 16 with parental consent, unlimited in case of pregnancy or birth of child with parental consent.
- Texas: 18, 16 with parental consent. 14 with judicial consent or if person under 18 had previously married and divorced
- Utah: 18 generally for first marriage, 16 with parental consent, 15 with court approval.
- Washington: 18, 17 with parental consent. May be waived by superior court judge.(statute)
- Wyoming: 18, 16 with parental consent.
Next observation. In states where there is "Judicial Consent" of any sort, is there also a policy of electing those judges for that jurisdiction? Washington I believe, is one of those states. If you owned a jurisdiction politically, could you not arrange then any marriage at any age? The law would be satisfied.
All of this is to make the case that states are not preventing sex with "children" and not preventing "children" from getting married and as long as it's legal in one place, it's essentially legal in another. I marry in Spokane or Durham, travel to Texas, no problem.
The state does not protect, once again, children from the possibility of sex. It only prevents an adult from having sex with several children concurrently. You can for instance have a 14 year old bride that you married in North Carolina that you knocked up while vacationing in Mexico or Utah. Allen Steed for instance, could have legally married Elissa Wall in that way. You can have at the same time a 18 year old mistress and a 40 year old one. Lest you think this is all too convoluted to be realistic, this is precisely why the FLDS lives in border towns.
The LEGALIZATION of Polygyny eliminates this problem since right now social pressure and law prevent Polygynists from doing what Monogamists can do, and from what children can do indiscriminately. The short answer is that our laws are discriminatory allowing one adult to have sex with a 14 year old without marrying her in some cases and another adult a year older, not to. You can be 20 in Utah and bed a 14 year old and have a problem, but 18, and still legally an adult, but not have a problem.
It is part of my proposal that such confusion be eliminated. Political action needs to be taken to make forms of marriage that monogamists engage in, and legal not marital relations that adults engage in, even with children, legal for the Polygynist. To do that Polygyny must be legal somewhere in this country. I will propose in my next post, what I am trying to do about that.
Sphere: Related Content
No comments:
Post a Comment